Umeå University's logo

umu.sePublications
Change search
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf
Lithium use during pregnancy in 14 countries
Centre for Pharmacoepidemiology, Department of Medicine Solna, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden.
Centre for Pharmacoepidemiology, Department of Medicine Solna, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden.
Department of Anesthesiology, Perioperative and Pain Medicine, Stanford University School of Medicine, CA, Stanford, United States.
Umeå University, Faculty of Medicine, Department of Clinical Sciences, Psychiatry. Centre for Psychiatry Research, Department of Clinical Neuroscience, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden; Stockholm Health Care Services, Region Stockholm, Stockholm, Sweden.
Show others and affiliations
2024 (English)In: JAMA Network Open, E-ISSN 2574-3805, Vol. 7, no 12, article id e2451117Article in journal (Refereed) Published
Abstract [en]

Importance: In pregnancy, the benefits of lithium treatment for relapse prevention in psychiatric conditions must be weighed against potential teratogenic effects. Currently, there is a paucity of information on how and when lithium is used by pregnant women.

Objective: To examine lithium use in the perinatal period.

Design, Setting, and Participants: This cohort study used individual-level data of pregnancies from January 1, 2000, to December 31, 2021, in Australia, Denmark, Finland, Germany, Hong Kong, Iceland, Israel, New Zealand, Norway, South Korea, Sweden, Taiwan, the UK, and 2 cohorts in the US. Analyses were performed from September 1 to November 30, 2023.

Exposures: The prevalence of lithium use as the proportion of pregnancies with at least 1 prescription fill or prescription within 3 months before pregnancy until childbirth was estimated using a common protocol. Lithium use during pregnancy by trimester and in the 3 months before and after pregnancy was examined.

Main Outcomes and Measures: Comparison of prevalence between the first and last 3-year periods of available data.

Results: Among 21 659 454 pregnancies from all collaborating sites, the prevalence of lithium use ranged from 0.07 per 1000 pregnancies in Hong Kong to 1.56 per 1000 in the US publicly insured population. Lithium use increased per 1000 pregnancies in 10 populations (Australia [0.60 to 0.74], Denmark [0.09 to 0.51], Finland [0.10 to 0.29], Iceland [0.24 to 0.99], Israel [0.25 to 0.37], Norway [0.24 to 0.47], South Korea [0.30 to 0.44], Sweden [0.42 to 1.07], the UK [0.07 to 0.10], and Taiwan [0.15 to 0.19]), remained stable in 4 populations (Germany [0.17 to 0.16], Hong Kong [0.06 to 0.06], and the publicly [1.50 to 1.34] and commercially [0.38 to 0.36] insured US populations), and decreased in 1 population (New Zealand [0.54 to 0.39]). Use of lithium decreased with each trimester of pregnancy, while prevalence of postpartum use was similar to prepregnancy levels. The proportion of lithium use in the second trimester compared with the prepregnancy period ranged from 2% in South Korea to 80% in Denmark.

Conclusions and Relevance: Prevalence of lithium use in pregnant women over the past 2 decades varied markedly between populations. Patterns of use before, during, and after pregnancy suggest that many women discontinued lithium use during pregnancy and reinitiated treatment after childbirth, with large variations between countries. These findings underscore the need for internationally harmonized guidelines, specifically for psychiatric conditions among pregnant women that may benefit from lithium treatment.

Place, publisher, year, edition, pages
American Medical Association (AMA), 2024. Vol. 7, no 12, article id e2451117
National Category
Psychiatry
Identifiers
URN: urn:nbn:se:umu:diva-233722DOI: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2024.51117ISI: 001381216800006PubMedID: 39680408Scopus ID: 2-s2.0-85212991947OAI: oai:DiVA.org:umu-233722DiVA, id: diva2:1925684
Funder
Forte, Swedish Research Council for Health, Working Life and Welfare, 2021-01222Available from: 2025-01-09 Created: 2025-01-09 Last updated: 2025-03-12Bibliographically approved

Open Access in DiVA

fulltext(1122 kB)46 downloads
File information
File name FULLTEXT01.pdfFile size 1122 kBChecksum SHA-512
f4abb77fbaed581b365dab8d8e8a57c4c498f6af046bdf1b1d87236b52a5f6636f108fb7a5ef2000ce8c2062d4927c4e076f47756c56a1d59be19e3e39762d6b
Type fulltextMimetype application/pdf

Other links

Publisher's full textPubMedScopus

Authority records

Bendix, Marie

Search in DiVA

By author/editor
Bendix, Marie
By organisation
Psychiatry
In the same journal
JAMA Network Open
Psychiatry

Search outside of DiVA

GoogleGoogle Scholar
Total: 46 downloads
The number of downloads is the sum of all downloads of full texts. It may include eg previous versions that are now no longer available

doi
pubmed
urn-nbn

Altmetric score

doi
pubmed
urn-nbn
Total: 290 hits
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf