Umeå University's logo

Background: The burden of disease attributable to tobacco smoking and harmful alcohol consumption poses a major threat to sustainable development in most low- and middle-income countries. However, evidence on tobacco use and harmful alcohol consumption to inform context-specific interventions addressing these harmful social behaviours is limited in the African context. This study aimed to determine the sociodemographic factors associated with daily tobacco smoking and binge drinking in Zambia.

Methods: The study stems from nationwide population-based representative survey data collected using the World Health Organization’s STEPwise approach for non-communicable disease risk factor surveillance in 2017 among 18–69-year-old Zambians. The main outcomes were daily tobacco smoking and binge drinking, and the demographic and socioeconomic variables included sex, marital status, age, residence, level of education and occupation. Prevalence ratios (PR) were calculated using log-binomial regression analysis.

Results: Overall, 4302 individuals (weighted percentage 49.0% men and 51.0% women) participated in the survey. The prevalence of daily tobacco smoking was 9.0%, and 11.6% of participants engaged in binge drinking, both of which were higher among men than women (17.1% vs. 1.3% and 18.6% vs. 5.3%, respectively). The adjusted prevalence of daily tobacco smoking was 14.3 (95% CI: 9.74-21.01) times higher in men than women, and 1.44 (95% CI 1.03-1.99) times higher in the > 45-year-old group compared to the 18–29-year-old group. Significant positive associations with daily tobacco smoking were found among those with no education 2.70 (95% CI 1.79- 4.07) or primary education 1.86 (95% CI 1.22-2.83) compared to those with senior secondary or tertiary education. The adjusted prevalence of daily tobacco smoking was 0.37 times lower (95% CI 0.16-0.86) among students and homemakers compared to employed participants. The adjusted prevalence of binge drinking was 3.67 times higher (95% CI 2.83-4.76) in men than in women. Significantly lower adjusted prevalences of binge drinking were found in rural residents 0.59 (95% CI: 0.46-0.77) compared to urban residents and in students/homemakers 0.58 (95% CI: 0.35-0.94) compared to employed participants.

Conclusion: This study shows huge differences between men and women regarding tobacco smoking and binge drinking in Zambia. A high occurrence of tobacco smoking was observed among men, older members of society and those with lower levels of education, while binge drinking was more common in men and in those living in urban areas. There is a need to reshape and refine preventive and control interventions for tobacco smoking and binge drinking to target the most at-risk groups in the country.

Background: The Framework Convention on Tobacco Control (FCTC) requires countries to develop and implement multi-sectoral tobacco control strategies, including policies and legislation. Zambia, potentially faced by a rising problem of tobacco smoking, signed the FCTC in 2008 but has been unable to enact a tobacco policy for over a decade.

Objective: This study explores the role of ‘principled engagement’, a key element of the theoretical framework for collaborative governance, in Zambia’s delayed success to develop a comprehensive tobacco control policy.

Methods: This was a qualitative case study of key stakeholders in the collaborative process of trying to develop a tobacco policy in Zambia. Participan-ts were sampled from across various sectors, including government departments and civil society, comprising anti-tobacco activists and researchers. A total of 27 key informant interviews were undertaken. We supplemented the interview data with a document review of relevant policies and legislation. Data were analysed using thematic analysis.

Results: Several factors hindered efforts to attain principled engagement, including the adverse legal and socioeconomic environment in which the collaborative regime evolves; poor planning of meetings and frequent changes in tobacco focal point persons; lack of active and meaningful participation; and communication challenges among the key stakeholders. These collaborative dynamics, coupled with the opposition to tobacco control efforts from within some government departments, revealed the inadequacy of the current collaborative governance regime to facilitate enactment of a comprehensive tobacco control policy in Zambia.

Conclusion: Efforts to develop a comprehensive tobacco control policy in Zambia will require addressing challenges such as disagreements, communication, and leadership at engagement level across interested sectors. We further argue that principled engagement has a greater role to play in unlocking these efforts and should therefore be embraced by those entrusted to lead the process to develop tobacco policy in Zambia.

In Zambia, efforts to produce a tobacco control policy have stalled for over a decade, and the country is not yet close to developing one. Limited studies have explored the dynamics in this policy process and how they affect the attainment of policy goals and outcomes. This study explored how collaborative dynamics within tobacco control policy development shaped shared motivation among stakeholders in Zambia. The study used a qualitative case study design that adopted a collaborative governance lens, comprising an in-depth exploration of the tobacco control policy working group meetings and their internal collaborative dynamics. The integrative framework for collaborative governance, which identifies mutual trust, mutual understanding, internal legitimacy and shared commitment as key elements of shared motivation, was adapted for this study. Data were collected from 27 key informants and analysed using thematic analysis. Several collaborative dynamics thwarted mutual trust among tobacco control stakeholders, including concerns about associated loyalties, fear of a ban on tobacco production, silo-mentality and lack of comprehensive dialogue. All stakeholders agreed that the limited sharing of information on tobacco control and the lack of reliable local evidence on the tobacco burden hindered mutual understanding. Diverse factors hampered internal legitimacy, including sector representatives’ lack of authority and the perceived lack of contextualization of the proposed policy content. Acknowledgement of the need for multisectoral action, lack of political will from other sectors and limited local allocation of funds to the process were some of the factors that shaped shared commitment. To accelerate the development of tobacco control policies in Zambia and elsewhere, policymakers must adopt strategies founded on shared motivation that deliberately create opportunities for open discourse and respectful interactions, promote a cultural shift towards collaborative information sharing and address unequal power relations to enable shaping of appropriate tobacco control actions in respective sectors.

Background: Alcohol use accounts for a huge proportion of the global burden of disease, and many countries grapple with its severe negative social and health consequences. In 2018, Zambia adopted a national alcohol policy with the aim to reduce the prevalence and impact of harmful alcohol use. However, five years post-adoption, the policy implementation has been slow. This study sought to explore the implementation determinants of the national alcohol policy five years post-enactment in Zambia.

Methods: We employed an exploratory qualitative case study using data collected from 25 in-depth interviews targeting government ministries, civil society, and agencies responsible for enforcing the alcohol policy. We applied both inductive and deductive manifest thematic analysis using Bullock’s analytical framework for understanding the determinants of implementing evidence-based policies.

Results: The alcohol policy provided a comprehensive framework for action, yet its policy directives remained unclear. A restructured policy coordination committee rejuvenated the momentum to implement the policy. However, weak collaboration between the council and state police hampered the enforcement of alcohol laws. Implementing agencies faced obstacles such as lack of financial and human resources, absence of rehabilitation services, and misapplication of alcohol selling licences. Further, community indifference, inaction, and resistance to alcohol control laws affected the policy implementation. The socio-political environment contributed to implementation challenges through framing alcohol as an economic development issue and culturally tolerating harmful alcohol use. Additionally, changes in government affected policy ownership while unregulated illicit alcohol production and the sale of traditional and imported spirits further hampered the implementation of the policy.

Conclusion: Overcoming implementation hurdles for contentious health policies demands comprehensive strategies such as engaging communities, challenging cultural norms, strategically assigning funding, and fostering collaboration among implementing agencies. In the case of Zambia's national alcohol policy, this may take the form of leveraging enablers such as stakeholder recognition of the policy framework and the restructured committee for the coordination of policy implementation, now under local government oversight. Key actions should include empowering local government to enforce measures to reduce unregulated alcohol availability and ensure adequate resource allocation for alcohol control activities among implementation agents, including those providing treatment and rehabilitation services.