Umeå University's logo

umu.sePublications
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf
Stoma versus no stoma prior to long-course neoadjuvant therapy in rectal cancer
Umeå University, Faculty of Medicine, Department of Diagnostics and Intervention.
Umeå University, Faculty of Medicine, Department of Diagnostics and Intervention.ORCID iD: 0000-0002-4950-2568
Umeå University, Faculty of Medicine, Department of Diagnostics and Intervention.ORCID iD: 0000-0002-5046-1820
Umeå University, Faculty of Social Sciences, Umeå School of Business and Economics (USBE), Statistics.ORCID iD: 0000-0002-8601-0159
Show others and affiliations
2025 (English)In: BJS Open, E-ISSN 2474-9842, Vol. 9, no 2, article id zrae169Article in journal (Refereed) Published
Abstract [en]

Background: Large bowel obstruction is a possible complication in patients undergoing neoadjuvant treatment for rectal cancer; however, it may be prevented by placing a pretreatment defunctioning stoma. The aim of this retrospective study was to investigate complication rates in patients with rectal cancer undergoing long-course neoadjuvant therapy, comparing those with and without a prophylactic stoma.

Methods: All patients with rectal cancer undergoing neoadjuvant therapy between 2007 and 2022 in Region Västerbotten, Sweden, were identified using the Swedish Colorectal Cancer Registry. Patients not planned for curative long-course neoadjuvant therapy and those requiring a stoma due to urgent bowel-related issues before treatment were excluded. The primary outcome was the incidence of complications between diagnosis and resection surgery or end of follow-up. The secondary outcomes were 30-day complications following resection, time to treatment (neoadjuvant therapy and surgery), and overall survival. Multivariable regression analysis was used, with adjustment for age, sex, American Society of Anesthesiologists fitness grade, and clinical tumour stage.

Results: Of 482 identified patients, 105 were analysed after exclusion. Among these, 22.9% (24 of 105) received a pretreatment stoma, whereas 77.1% (81 of 105) received upfront neoadjuvant therapy. The complication incidence before resection in the group with a defunctioning stoma and in the group without a defunctioning stoma was 75.0% (18 of 24) and 29.6% (24 of 81) respectively. A considerable number of complications were directly caused by the stoma surgery. Patients in the stoma group had an adjusted OR of 6.71 (95% c.i. 2.17 to 20.76) for any complication. However, for 30-day complications following resection, an adjusted non-significant OR of 2.05 (95% c.i. 0.62 to 6.81) was documented for the stoma group, in comparison with the control group. Neoadjuvant treatment was also delayed for the stoma group (adjusted mean time difference: 21 (95% c.i. 14 to 27) days), whereas the difference was not significant for the time to resection surgery. The median survival after diagnosis was 4.7 years in the stoma group and 12.2 years in the control group (P = 0.015); however, adjustment in the multivariable analysis rendered the estimate non-significant (HR 1.71 (95% c.i. 0.93 to 3.14)).

Conclusion: Patients with rectal cancer who receive a stoma before long-course neoadjuvant therapy, in the absence of urgent symptoms, experience more complications than those without a stoma and a delay with regard to the start of neoadjuvant treatment.

Place, publisher, year, edition, pages
Oxford University Press, 2025. Vol. 9, no 2, article id zrae169
Keywords [en]
neoadjuvant therapy, stomas, surgical procedures, operative, diagnosis, surgery specialty, rectal carcinoma
National Category
Surgery
Identifiers
URN: urn:nbn:se:umu:diva-237161DOI: 10.1093/bjsopen/zrae169ISI: 001446187800001PubMedID: 40098238Scopus ID: 2-s2.0-105000538408OAI: oai:DiVA.org:umu-237161DiVA, id: diva2:1952070
Funder
Swedish Cancer Society, 23 3056 FkRegion Västerbotten, HSN 530-2022Available from: 2025-04-14 Created: 2025-04-14 Last updated: 2025-04-14Bibliographically approved

Open Access in DiVA

fulltext(321 kB)21 downloads
File information
File name FULLTEXT01.pdfFile size 321 kBChecksum SHA-512
3b34fa82d654fbcaf6b239d0e7037a77002ca9e65b8255a749241422109537102c26b8abc7edf35033ff9a71afdea57096d8fd25c262ef48d03fc06cd122d756
Type fulltextMimetype application/pdf

Other links

Publisher's full textPubMedScopus

Authority records

Sandén, GustavBoström, PetrusLjuslinder, IngridSvensson, JohanRutegård, Martin

Search in DiVA

By author/editor
Sandén, GustavBoström, PetrusLjuslinder, IngridSvensson, JohanRutegård, Martin
By organisation
Department of Diagnostics and InterventionStatistics
In the same journal
BJS Open
Surgery

Search outside of DiVA

GoogleGoogle Scholar
Total: 23 downloads
The number of downloads is the sum of all downloads of full texts. It may include eg previous versions that are now no longer available

doi
pubmed
urn-nbn

Altmetric score

doi
pubmed
urn-nbn
Total: 201 hits
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf