Umeå University's logo

umu.sePublications
Change search
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf
Genomic findings with familial implications: agenda setting in light of mainstreaming
Department of Public Health and Primary Care, Centre for Biomedical Ethics and Law KU Leuven, Flanders, Leuven, Belgium; Department of Clinical and Biomedical Sciences, University of Exeter Medical School, Exeter, United Kingdom.
Department of Public Health and Primary Care, Centre for Biomedical Ethics and Law KU Leuven, Flanders, Leuven, Belgium.
Department of Public Health and Primary Care, Centre for Biomedical Ethics and Law KU Leuven, Flanders, Leuven, Belgium; Department of Health, Ethics & Society, Maastricht University GROW, School for Oncology and Reproduction, Limburg, Maastricht, Netherlands.
Department of Sociology, Centre for Sociological Research KU Leuven, Flanders, Leuven, Belgium.
Show others and affiliations
2025 (English)In: Open Research Europe, E-ISSN 2732-5121, Vol. 5, article id 4Article in journal (Refereed) Published
Abstract [en]

An international workshop was held in Leuven, Belgium, on June 19–20, 2023, to discuss the communication of genetic risk information within families in the context of personalized prevention. Organized as part of the Horizon Europe project PROPHET (PeRsOnalised Prevention roadmap for the future HEalThcare in Europe), the event gathered interdisciplinary stakeholders to explore the benefits and challenges of various policy approaches for returning genetic test results with implications for family members. Five key themes emerged from the discussions: (1) recognizing family communication as an ongoing process, (2) adopting a family-centered approach rather than an individual one, (3) clarifying roles and responsibilities in the communication process, (4) addressing the lack of clear guidelines and policies, and (5) ensuring sufficient resources. To enhance family communication of genetic risk information, participants emphasized the importance of improving pre-test counseling and follow-up procedures, implementing policies to clarify roles and responsibilities, and providing training for healthcare professionals both within and outside genetic services.

Place, publisher, year, edition, pages
F1000 Research Ltd , 2025. Vol. 5, article id 4
Keywords [en]
cascade screening, Family communication, genetic counseling, genetic risk, genetic screening, personalized prevention, policy
National Category
Medical Genetics and Genomics
Identifiers
URN: urn:nbn:se:umu:diva-238099DOI: 10.12688/openreseurope.19128.1PubMedID: 40212820Scopus ID: 2-s2.0-105002810908OAI: oai:DiVA.org:umu-238099DiVA, id: diva2:1955502
Available from: 2025-04-30 Created: 2025-04-30 Last updated: 2025-04-30Bibliographically approved

Open Access in DiVA

No full text in DiVA

Other links

Publisher's full textPubMedScopus

Authority records

Rosén, Anna

Search in DiVA

By author/editor
Rosén, Anna
By organisation
Department of Diagnostics and Intervention
In the same journal
Open Research Europe
Medical Genetics and Genomics

Search outside of DiVA

GoogleGoogle Scholar

doi
pubmed
urn-nbn

Altmetric score

doi
pubmed
urn-nbn
Total: 64 hits
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf