Umeå University's logo

umu.sePublications
Change search
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf
How organizations can innovate with generative AI
Umeå University, Faculty of Social Sciences, Department of Informatics. Swedish Center for Digital Innovation, Umeå University, Sweden..
Lero, SFI Research Centre for Software, School of Business & Economics, University of Galway, Ireland.
2025 (English)In: Business Horizons, ISSN 0007-6813, E-ISSN 1873-6068, Vol. 68, no 5, p. 559-573Article in journal (Refereed) Published
Abstract [en]

Artificial intelligence (AI) is poised to have a profound influence on businesses across all sectors. Specifically, generative AI is set to underpin the development of potent and novel capabilities, ushering in a new wave of innovation. For example, ChatGPT has seen massive hype surrounding its launch, with growing speculation regarding its disruptive nature for organizations and society. The ongoing debate argues that ChatGPT will lead to far-reaching innovation. However, it is less clear whether such innovation can be managed. We seek to close this gap by identifying distinctive innovation strategies in terms of two key dimensions: automation and augmentation (high or low). This results in a typology of four generic innovation strategies: Traditional Tool (low automation, low augmentation), Basic Automation (high automation, low augmentation), Automated Assistance (low automation, high augmentation), and Assisted Augmentation (high automation, high augmentation). The strategies and typology essentially differ in relation to automation and augmentation for innovation, risks, and challenges faced in the process, and available tactics for managing the process. Building upon this framework, our insights suggest that practitioners can harness ChatGPT effectively by aligning their innovation objectives with the appropriate strategy, whether it be enhancing creative processes or streamlining operational efficiency, thereby navigating the complexities of innovation with a more structured and strategic approach.

Place, publisher, year, edition, pages
Elsevier, 2025. Vol. 68, no 5, p. 559-573
Keywords [en]
Artificial intelligence, Augmentation, Automation, ChatGPT, Innovation, Prompt engineering
National Category
Business Administration
Identifiers
URN: urn:nbn:se:umu:diva-238347DOI: 10.1016/j.bushor.2024.02.010Scopus ID: 2-s2.0-85206666573OAI: oai:DiVA.org:umu-238347DiVA, id: diva2:1960532
Available from: 2025-05-23 Created: 2025-05-23 Last updated: 2025-09-25Bibliographically approved

Open Access in DiVA

fulltext(738 kB)467 downloads
File information
File name FULLTEXT02.pdfFile size 738 kBChecksum SHA-512
0b6af1e6f02df9067fa27bd2da2d43033dc70f5a6a6630f3669398b9cd32b5f25e7698d730067cbca43fa7bc25175989418dad98fedbc92edf9250bf4ae6089a
Type fulltextMimetype application/pdf

Other links

Publisher's full textScopus

Authority records

Holmström, Jonny

Search in DiVA

By author/editor
Holmström, Jonny
By organisation
Department of Informatics
In the same journal
Business Horizons
Business Administration

Search outside of DiVA

GoogleGoogle Scholar
Total: 604 downloads
The number of downloads is the sum of all downloads of full texts. It may include eg previous versions that are now no longer available

doi
urn-nbn

Altmetric score

doi
urn-nbn
Total: 431 hits
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf