Umeå University's logo

umu.sePublications
Change search
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf
Adaptation of the WHO COVID-19 clinical progression scale for registry-based data: a whole-population study in Sweden
Umeå University, Faculty of Medicine, Department of Clinical Microbiology.ORCID iD: 0000-0002-5328-9536
Umeå University, Faculty of Medicine, Department of Clinical Microbiology.
Umeå University, Faculty of Medicine, Department of Clinical Microbiology.
Epidemiological Infectious Disease Preparedness, Statens Serum Institut, Copenhagen, Denmark; Department of Drug Development and Pharmacology, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark.
Show others and affiliations
2025 (English)In: Clinical Epidemiology, E-ISSN 1179-1349, Vol. 17, p. 663-679Article in journal (Refereed) Published
Abstract [en]

Purpose: COVID-19 has been extensively researched; however, the lack of standardized COVID-19 severity categorization in register-based research complicates comparison of studies. The WHO COVID-19 Clinical Progression Scale is a standardized disease severity tool for clinical data, though not adapted to data available in health registries. We aimed to develop and validate such a novel categorization with international applicability.

Methods: The WHO Clinical Progression Scale was translated to a severity index utilizing ICD-and procedure-codes from outpatient, inpatient, intensive care, and mortality registries using the adult Swedish population and SARS-CoV-2 positive-test data (January 2020 – July 2022). Cox proportional hazards were applied to determine whether increasing severity correlates with mortality in COVID-19 patients compared to the population.

Results: The WHO-Scale was translated to ten categories reflecting the increasing need for advanced care, encompassing 8,245,474 individuals including 1,981,946 SARS-CoV-2 infections. Fatal COVID-19 cases were older with more comorbidities. Those receiving mechanical ventilation and ECMO were younger with fewer comorbidities. Among survivors beyond 30 days, 90-day all-cause mortality increased with severity using category zero (no laboratory-verified SARS-CoV-2) as reference. Mortality was lowest for patients without health care adjusted for age, sex, comorbidities and socio-economic variables (adjusted hazard ratio (aHR) 1.18, 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.13–1.22). Those hospitalized >5 days had higher mortality (aHR 5.83, 5.5–6.17). Those requiring ECMO/ ECLS had the highest mortality (aHR 593.54, 317.77–1108.65).

Conclusion: The novel COVID-19 severity index associated with all-cause 90-day mortality and aligned with previous literature. This index will enable comparative studies of COVID-19, which is important for public health policies and development of clinical guidelines. This is an innovative epidemiologic tool with potential applicability in all countries with centralised health registers. The index also has the potential to be used for other infectious diseases and in real-time data for modelling predictions.

Place, publisher, year, edition, pages
Dove Medical Press, 2025. Vol. 17, p. 663-679
Keywords [en]
COVID-19, disease severity index, epidemiology, infectious diseases, standardization, whole-population
National Category
Epidemiology Public Health, Global Health and Social Medicine Infectious Medicine
Identifiers
URN: urn:nbn:se:umu:diva-242448DOI: 10.2147/CLEP.S525030ISI: 001532450400001PubMedID: 40686692Scopus ID: 2-s2.0-105011496271OAI: oai:DiVA.org:umu-242448DiVA, id: diva2:1986367
Funder
Swedish Research Council, 2021-06536Region Västerbotten, RV-1006715Region Västerbotten, RV-982300Region Västerbotten, RV-996166Region Västerbotten, RV-1010337Swedish Heart Lung Foundation, 20220179The Kempe Foundations, SMK21-0014Available from: 2025-07-31 Created: 2025-07-31 Last updated: 2026-05-29Bibliographically approved

Open Access in DiVA

fulltext(3944 kB)73 downloads
File information
File name FULLTEXT01.pdfFile size 3944 kBChecksum SHA-512
39dbb58ecd88b48213ac826aecc8bdc658d370d6373cfbeb31ccd30bbf634ac87f0b5543b929e1c49014757d404aea375e3c2fd5313af6cd2f246a82ac992864
Type fulltextMimetype application/pdf

Other links

Publisher's full textPubMedScopus

Authority records

Jerndal, HannaKalucza, SebastianJakobsson, FridaAhlm, ClasNormark, JohanFonseca Rodriguez, OsvaldoEriksson, MarieFors Connolly, Anne-Marie

Search in DiVA

By author/editor
Jerndal, HannaKalucza, SebastianJakobsson, FridaAhlm, ClasNormark, JohanFonseca Rodriguez, OsvaldoEriksson, MarieFors Connolly, Anne-Marie
By organisation
Department of Clinical MicrobiologyStatistics
In the same journal
Clinical Epidemiology
EpidemiologyPublic Health, Global Health and Social MedicineInfectious Medicine

Search outside of DiVA

GoogleGoogle Scholar
Total: 76 downloads
The number of downloads is the sum of all downloads of full texts. It may include eg previous versions that are now no longer available

doi
pubmed
urn-nbn

Altmetric score

doi
pubmed
urn-nbn
Total: 605 hits
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf