Umeå University's logo

umu.sePublications
Change search
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf
The European nutrition research landscape: diversity and perspectives
Umeå University, Faculty of Social Sciences, Department of Food, Nutrition and Culinary Science.ORCID iD: 0000-0003-1270-2678
Centre for Public Health, Institute of Clinical Sciences, Queen's University Belfast, Northern Ireland, Belfast, United Kingdom.
Nutrition and Food Research Center and Institute of Biomedicine, Integrative Physiology and Pharmacology Unit, Faculty of Medicine, University of Turku, Turku, Finland.
Center for Nutrition, Building for Basic Biological Research, University of Bergen, Bergen, Norway.
Show others and affiliations
2025 (English)In: European Journal of Nutrition, ISSN 1436-6207, E-ISSN 1436-6215, Vol. 64, no 5, article id 240Article in journal (Refereed) Published
Abstract [en]

Purpose: The diversification of Nutrition Sciences (NS) in recent decades has highlighted the need to review current practices in relation to funding, communication and interaction with stakeholders. The Federation of European Nutrition Societies (FENS) Presidential Activity “Improving standards in the science of nutrition” established three working groups to develop consensus documents. This paper is part of Working Group 2 (WG2) “Organisation, Capabilities and Funding” and aims at describing the European Nutrition Research Landscape, addressing its diversity, challenges and future perspectives.

Methods: WG2 developed two rounds of questionnaires designed to map the current funding architecture in FENS member countries. Questionnaires were administered to representatives of national NS member societies in 2022 and desk research was carried out to describe the main European Union (EU) sources of funding. Qualitative data analysis was performed on questionnaire data collected and agreed and approved by WG2.

Results: 42% of representatives responded to the first round of data collection, and 30% to the second round of data collection. Results indicate that the NS field is mainly funded by public agencies, private actors, and by contract. Most calls are multi-disciplinary and the majority of societies were aware of risks posed by engagement with the private sector and financial conflicts of interest (COI).

Conclusion: This exercise provides an insight into the funding landscape across Europe for NS and highlights the uniquely multifaceted funding sources and dynamics across the continent. This work also underscores the challenges NS faces and progress made with issues surrounding COI and the associated reputation of NS.

Place, publisher, year, edition, pages
Springer Nature, 2025. Vol. 64, no 5, article id 240
National Category
Nutrition and Dietetics
Identifiers
URN: urn:nbn:se:umu:diva-242518DOI: 10.1007/s00394-025-03681-2ISI: 001531490700001PubMedID: 40676332Scopus ID: 2-s2.0-105011883474OAI: oai:DiVA.org:umu-242518DiVA, id: diva2:1987069
Available from: 2025-08-05 Created: 2025-08-05 Last updated: 2025-08-05Bibliographically approved

Open Access in DiVA

No full text in DiVA

Other links

Publisher's full textPubMedScopus

Authority records

Perez-Cueto, Federico J. A.Garin, Jean-Paul

Search in DiVA

By author/editor
Perez-Cueto, Federico J. A.Garin, Jean-Paul
By organisation
Department of Food, Nutrition and Culinary Science
In the same journal
European Journal of Nutrition
Nutrition and Dietetics

Search outside of DiVA

GoogleGoogle Scholar

doi
pubmed
urn-nbn

Altmetric score

doi
pubmed
urn-nbn
Total: 88 hits
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf