Umeå University's logo

umu.sePublications
Change search
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf
Did health reform improve financial protection for disadvantaged groups in Ecuador?: a socio-economic inequality assessment of catastrophic health expenditures 2006-2014.
Umeå University, Faculty of Medicine, Department of Epidemiology and Global Health. Colegio Ciencias de la Salud, Quito, Ecuador.ORCID iD: 0000-0001-7111-5030
Umeå University, Faculty of Medicine, Department of Epidemiology and Global Health.ORCID iD: 0000-0001-7234-3510
Colegio Ciencias de la Salud, Quito, Ecuador.
Umeå University, Faculty of Medicine, Department of Epidemiology and Global Health.ORCID iD: 0000-0001-8723-8131
2025 (English)In: BMJ Open, E-ISSN 2044-6055, Vol. 15, no 7, article id e100522Article in journal (Refereed) Published
Abstract [en]

OBJECTIVES: Latin American countries have long struggled with socioeconomic inequalities and health equity. In 2007, Ecuador implemented a health reform to address these issues by making public health services free, coordinating finances between subsystems and increasing the state's health budget. This study evaluates whether Ecuador's health system reform (2007-2017) reduced out-of-pocket (OOP) health spending, catastrophic health spending (CHS) and socioeconomic inequalities in CHS.

DESIGN: Cross-sectional study.

SETTING: Secondary data available of households from the 2006 and 2014 National Living Standards Measurement surveys.

METHODS: Descriptive statistics (means and medians) and log-binomial regression were applied to assess prevalence of OOP and socioeconomic inequalities (residence, region, health insurance status and wealth) in catastrophic health expenditure (CHE) for each period and over time.

RESULTS: Overall, there was a significant reduction of 14% points in the proportion of households with OOP healthcare expenditure. The prevalence of CHE decreased from 17% to 10% and within each socioeconomic group over time. Significant reductions in relative risk were observed in all socioeconomic variables. The inequality in CHE decreased significantly in households placed in rural areas (relative difference (RD): 0.88; 95% CI: 0.79 to 0.97) and poorest (RD: 0.82; 95% CI: 0.69 to 0.97); however, it increased within regions (RD: 0.58; 95% CI: 0.44 to 0.76) and for uninsured households (RD: 1.39; 95% CI: 0.95 to 2.04).

CONCLUSIONS: This study suggests that recent health reform effectively reduced OOP healthcare expenditure, CHE and some socioeconomic inequalities. Future reforms should further invest in key areas, expand health insurance for the most disadvantaged and monitor progress towards universal health coverage to address persistent inequalities.

Place, publisher, year, edition, pages
BMJ Publishing Group Ltd, 2025. Vol. 15, no 7, article id e100522
Keywords [en]
Cross-Sectional Studies, Health, Public Health
National Category
Public Health, Global Health and Social Medicine Health Care Service and Management, Health Policy and Services and Health Economy
Identifiers
URN: urn:nbn:se:umu:diva-243840DOI: 10.1136/bmjopen-2025-100522ISI: 001539348600001PubMedID: 40738632Scopus ID: 2-s2.0-105012385360OAI: oai:DiVA.org:umu-243840DiVA, id: diva2:1994704
Funder
Familjen Erling-Perssons Stiftelse
Note

Originally included in thesis with as manuscript, with title "Socioeconomic inequalities in catastrophic health expenditures in Ecuador: Has the recent health system reform contributed to reducing socio-economic inequalities in financial protection?"

Available from: 2025-09-03 Created: 2025-09-03 Last updated: 2025-09-04Bibliographically approved

Open Access in DiVA

fulltext(473 kB)75 downloads
File information
File name FULLTEXT01.pdfFile size 473 kBChecksum SHA-512
f3c6f3236ad5cca6d01ba43af26dced45cb1412eb05786cbc5a478701f3a8037be50de784789873469facca69a73ec9844db832489a17b600568ebf3af8b9f2e
Type fulltextMimetype application/pdf

Other links

Publisher's full textPubMedScopusManuscript version in dissertation

Authority records

Quizhpe, EdySan Sebastian, MiguelPulkki-Brännström, Anni-Maria

Search in DiVA

By author/editor
Quizhpe, EdySan Sebastian, MiguelPulkki-Brännström, Anni-Maria
By organisation
Department of Epidemiology and Global Health
In the same journal
BMJ Open
Public Health, Global Health and Social MedicineHealth Care Service and Management, Health Policy and Services and Health Economy

Search outside of DiVA

GoogleGoogle Scholar
Total: 75 downloads
The number of downloads is the sum of all downloads of full texts. It may include eg previous versions that are now no longer available

doi
pubmed
urn-nbn

Altmetric score

doi
pubmed
urn-nbn
Total: 628 hits
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf