Preserved ratio impaired spirometry, dysanapsis and airflow obstruction with low forced expiratory volume in 1 s in childhood asthmaShow others and affiliations
2025 (English)In: ERJ Open Research, E-ISSN 2312-0541, Vol. 11, no 5, article id 00023-2025Article in journal (Refereed) Published
Abstract [en]
Background: Airway obstruction is a characteristic spirometric finding in asthma but the clinical significance of other abnormal spirometric patterns is less well described. We aimed to explore pre-and post-bronchodilator (BD) prevalences and clinical characteristics of preserved ratio impaired spirometry (PRISm), dysanapsis and airflow obstruction with low forced expiratory volume in 1 s (FEV1) in children diagnosed with asthma.
Methods: We extracted specialist care data (clinical and spirometry) from the Swedish National Airway Register (n=3301, age 5–17 years). Normal spirometry was defined as FEV1⩾ lower limit of normal (LLN) and FEV1/forced vital capacity (FVC)⩾LLN. PRISm was defined as forced FEV1< LLN and FEV1/FVC⩾LLN, dysanapsis as FEV1/FVC<LLN and FEV1⩾LLN, and airflow obstruction with reduced FEV1 as FEV1/FVC<LLN and FEV1<LLN. The BD response (BDR) was calculated as ((post-BD(L)−pre-BD(L))/predicted (L))×100. Values >10% were considered positive (BDRpos). Groups were compared using parametric tests and associations were explored using logistic regression analysis.
Results: Pre-/post-BD PRISm, dysanapsis and obstruction with low FEV1 were identified in 9%/7%, 10%/4% and 8%/2%, respectively. Compared with normal spirometry, all three groups were associated with older age and BDRpos in pre-BD analyses. Furthermore, dysanapsis was associated with overweight/ obesity and obstruction with low FEV1 with uncontrolled asthma and more treatment.
Interpretation: In this paediatric asthma cohort, PRISm and dysanapsis were associated with BDRpos and they were at least as common as airflow obstruction with reduced FEV1. These spirometric phenotypes should be addressed in the management of childhood asthma and testing of BDR should be considered also in children with PRISm and dysanapsis.
Place, publisher, year, edition, pages
European Respiratory Society, 2025. Vol. 11, no 5, article id 00023-2025
National Category
Respiratory Medicine and Allergy
Identifiers
URN: urn:nbn:se:umu:diva-244689DOI: 10.1183/23120541.00023-2025ISI: 001576347800001PubMedID: 40927545Scopus ID: 2-s2.0-105015832720OAI: oai:DiVA.org:umu-244689DiVA, id: diva2:2001945
Funder
Swedish Heart Lung Foundation, 20230537Swedish Heart Lung Foundation, 20230473Swedish Heart Lung Foundation, 20200150Swedish Heart Lung Foundation, 2022-0478Norrbotten County CouncilRegion StockholmConsul Berghs FoundationSwedish Asthma and Allergy AssociationSwedish Association for Allergology (SFFA)The Kamprad Family Foundation, 20190024Forte, Swedish Research Council for Health, Working Life and Welfare, 2022-00381Swedish Research Council, 2019-002472025-09-292025-09-292025-09-29Bibliographically approved