Umeå University's logo

umu.sePublications
Change search
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf
Fosfomycin versus ciprofloxacin for transrectal prostate biopsy: an open randomised controlled multicentre drug trial
Department of Urology, University of Gothenburg, Sweden; Department of Urology, Sahlgrenska University Hospital, Sweden.
Department of Biomedical and Clinical Sciences, Linköping University, Sweden.
Department of Urology, Örebro University Hospital, Sweden.
Department of Biomedical and Clinical Sciences, Linköping University, Sweden.
Show others and affiliations
2026 (English)In: Journal of Clinical Urology, ISSN 2051-4158, Vol. 19, no 2, p. 170-177Article in journal (Refereed) Published
Abstract [en]

Objective: Antibiotic prophylaxis reduces infection risk following transrectal prostate biopsy. Studies in countries with high antibiotic resistance show that fosfomycin, given an hour or more before biopsy, has equal or better outcomes than ciprofloxacin. This study aimed to evaluate if fosfomycin, administered immediately before biopsy, is as effective as ciprofloxacin in Sweden, where antibiotic resistance is low.

Material and Methods: A randomised, non-inferiority study of different antibiotic prophylactic regimes, including men undergoing transrectal prostate biopsy, was conducted. A total of 3448 patients were planned to be included. Primary outcome was hospitalisation due to urinary tract infection (UTI) within 14 days. Men without risk factors for infection received either fosfomycin or ciprofloxacin immediately before biopsy. Patients with risk factors received additional doses post-biopsy.

Results: The study was stopped by the safety board after enrolment of 42 men. Four of 20 men (25%) in the fosfomycin group were hospitalised due to UTI, including two with positive blood cultures for Pseudomonas, whereas no hospitalisations (0%) occurred in the ciprofloxacin group. The main limitation was the small sample size.

Conclusion: Fosfomycin administered immediately before biopsy was not supported by this study. The results may be skewed by the high incidence of Pseudomonas infections.

Level of evidence: 2

Place, publisher, year, edition, pages
Sage Publications, 2026. Vol. 19, no 2, p. 170-177
Keywords [en]
antibiotic prophylaxis, fosfomycin, prostate, Prostate biopsy, prostate cancer, urological infections
National Category
Urology Nephrology
Identifiers
URN: urn:nbn:se:umu:diva-246570DOI: 10.1177/20514158251376398ISI: 001590581500001Scopus ID: 2-s2.0-105019244608OAI: oai:DiVA.org:umu-246570DiVA, id: diva2:2015238
Available from: 2025-11-20 Created: 2025-11-20 Last updated: 2026-05-21Bibliographically approved

Open Access in DiVA

fulltext(234 kB)3 downloads
File information
File name FULLTEXT02.pdfFile size 234 kBChecksum SHA-512
2d5102baa54bb9d34b0c711e2dfb52fd991aa0d59a913b7515ab8c787e0ba834f92270a25e876d30704759726cc24ced7a9960992b73faa13d68822825b1de2f
Type fulltextMimetype application/pdf

Other links

Publisher's full textScopus

Authority records

Fridriksson, JonGranåsen, GabrielLundström, Karl-JohanBackman Lönn, BeatriceStyrke, Johan

Search in DiVA

By author/editor
Fridriksson, JonGranåsen, GabrielLundström, Karl-JohanBackman Lönn, BeatriceStyrke, Johan
By organisation
Department of Diagnostics and InterventionDepartment of Nursing
UrologyNephrology

Search outside of DiVA

GoogleGoogle Scholar
Total: 27 downloads
The number of downloads is the sum of all downloads of full texts. It may include eg previous versions that are now no longer available

doi
urn-nbn

Altmetric score

doi
urn-nbn
Total: 260 hits
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf