Umeå University's logo

umu.sePublications
Change search
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf
Development and testing of a new measure of socialconnection for long-term care homes: the SONNET study
University of Toronto, ON, Toronto, Canada; KITE Research Institute, Toronto Rehabilitation Institute - University Health Network, ON, Toronto, Canada.
KITE Research Institute, Toronto Rehabilitation Institute - University Health Network, ON, Toronto, Canada.
Queen Mary University of London, London, United Kingdom.
Western University of Health Sciences, OR, United States.
Show others and affiliations
2025 (English)In: Alzheimer's & Dementia: Journal of the Alzheimer's Association, ISSN 1552-5260, E-ISSN 1552-5279, Vol. 21, no S4, article id e098452Article in journal, Meeting abstract (Refereed) Published
Abstract [en]

BACKGROUND: Social connection comprises distinct but related aspects of human social relationships. Positive aspects of social connection are associated with better health and, in long-term care (LTC) homes, represent a key component of quality of life, quality of care and sense of home. Despite its importance, research and reporting on social connection in this setting is limited by a lack of good quality instruments with which to measure it. Our objective was to develop and test a measure of social connection for LTC homes.

METHOD: We conducted this study in Canada and the UK. We developed a conceptual model based on research literature and existing measures. We conducted and thematically analysed qualitative interviews with residents, families and staff to identify important aspects of social connection. We created and refined a list of candidate items that we piloted and field-tested with LTC residents and staff. We examined descriptive statistics (e.g., missing data), dimensionality and internal consistency to further refine the measure. We evaluated the final resident (self-report) and staff (proxy-report) measures' feasibility, acceptability, reliability and validity. We worked with patient and public involvement (PPI) partners in developing our methods and the Social Connection in LTC homes (SONNET) measure.

RESULT: We prioritized social engagement and social connectedness (loneliness) from our conceptual model of social connection, based on priorities identified from qualitative interviews (n = 67) and PPI partners. We developed 58 candidate items for self-report and proxy-report which we then reduced to 20 items based on feedback from academic experts and PPI partners and pilot testing (n = 9). We further reduced this to 12 items based on field-testing (n = 111 resident-staff dyads) results. We tested the measurement properties with 52 resident-staff dyads, including 33 (65%) residents with dementia. Findings supported the hypothesised two factor structure; that the SONNET scale correlated with related constructs; and good/ acceptable and reliability (internal consistency, test-retest and inter-rater).

CONCLUSION: The SONNET scale assesses social engagement and social connectedness (loneliness) for LTC home residents, with resident and staff-reported versions. It is feasible and acceptable to LTC residents and staff with promising reliability and validity, although we recommend further testing.

Place, publisher, year, edition, pages
John Wiley & Sons, 2025. Vol. 21, no S4, article id e098452
National Category
Nursing Gerontology, specialising in Medical and Health Sciences
Identifiers
URN: urn:nbn:se:umu:diva-248309DOI: 10.1002/alz70858_098452Scopus ID: 2-s2.0-105025832844OAI: oai:DiVA.org:umu-248309DiVA, id: diva2:2028387
Conference
2025 Alzheimer’s Association International Conference (AAIC 2025), Toronto, Canada, 31 July, 2025
Available from: 2026-01-14 Created: 2026-01-14 Last updated: 2026-01-14Bibliographically approved

Open Access in DiVA

fulltext(90 kB)17 downloads
File information
File name FULLTEXT01.pdfFile size 90 kBChecksum SHA-512
cc18986f418f011ff9fa2c7f24bd0060b046a9fe8a08c4ff79e08836c6424c38b4d232337d5e34780d8895bc7f1f7e690f7bd258d8ffc89035015eb11b63ac81
Type fulltextMimetype application/pdf

Other links

Publisher's full textScopus

Authority records

Edvardsson, David

Search in DiVA

By author/editor
Edvardsson, David
By organisation
Department of Nursing
In the same journal
Alzheimer's & Dementia: Journal of the Alzheimer's Association
NursingGerontology, specialising in Medical and Health Sciences

Search outside of DiVA

GoogleGoogle Scholar
The number of downloads is the sum of all downloads of full texts. It may include eg previous versions that are now no longer available

doi
urn-nbn

Altmetric score

doi
urn-nbn
Total: 995 hits
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf