Umeå University's logo

Introduction: Video consultation (VC) became vital for improving healthcare access during COVID-19 pandemic and remains so. Despite evidence of effectiveness, concerns including technology literacy and inconsistencies in experience highlight the need for larger, patient-focused studies. While patients appreciate the convenience of VC, challenges during complex issues and patients’ preferences for in-person care persists. Synthesising qualitative studies offers insights into the fragmented understanding of patient experiences with VC. This review explores adult patients’ experiences of VC.

Methods: A systematic literature search was conducted for studies published between 2011 and 2024 and reported according to the PRISMA statement. Study quality was assessed using the CASP checklist, and data were analysed through thematic synthesis. Confidence in the findings was evaluated using GRADE-CERQual.

Results: In total, 3203 unique studies were retrieved; 13 were included in the final synthesis, resulting in four main themes: (1) suitable for less complex issues when technical problems can be solved; (2) feeling secure, relaxed, and having mutual focus in an equitable partnership; (3) limitations regarding personal needs and practical help; and (4) increased vulnerability and lack of emotional feedback.

Conclusion: VC is experienced as ideal for managing less complex issues but is challenging for emotional topics due to technical concerns. It empowers patients by providing a neutral place for focused conversations but can create vulnerability and distance that can challenge the patient–professional relationship. Success requires technological adaptation, sufficient time during VC, and emotional support. VC should complement – not replace – traditional care, with its use determined in dialogue with patients.