Umeå University's logo

umu.sePublications
Change search
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf
Riparian vegetation diversity in boreal headwaters: comparing streams, modified waterways, and ditches
Department of Forest Ecology and Management, Swedish University of Agricultural Sciences, Umeå, Sweden; Australian Rivers Institute, Griffith University, QLD, Nathan, Australia.
Department of Forest Ecology and Management, Swedish University of Agricultural Sciences, Umeå, Sweden.
Umeå University, Faculty of Science and Technology, Department of Ecology and Environmental Sciences.ORCID iD: 0000-0002-5758-2705
Department of Forest Ecology and Management, Swedish University of Agricultural Sciences, Umeå, Sweden.
Show others and affiliations
2026 (English)In: Ecosphere, E-ISSN 2150-8925, Vol. 17, no 5, article id e70665Article in journal (Refereed) Published
Abstract [en]

Decades of forest management in the boreal biome have involved digging drainage ditches and modifying streams to increase timber production, altering terrestrial ecosystems and expanding stream networks. Modified waterways and drainage ditches represent widespread novel aquatic and riparian ecosystems, with little known about their biodiversity. With approximately 68% of small waterways in Sweden human-made or modified, improved knowledge is needed to inform effective management of biodiversity of these often-disregarded habitats. Currently, ditches and modified waterways may undergo ditch network maintenance, involving the removal of debris and vegetation, with less emphasis placed on protecting them with vegetated buffers compared to natural waterways. In this study, we surveyed riparian vegetation across soil types (till and peat) along a drainage size gradient (0.5–60 ha) in a northern boreal catchment, assessing the riparian vegetation among ditches, modified waterways, and “natural” streams. We found that the vegetation in this catchment did not differ significantly between modified waterways and streams on till soils, highlighting an important role for modified waterways in maintaining riparian vegetation diversity. Till ditches exhibited similar community composition, although significantly lower diversity, compared to modified waterways and streams on till. By comparison, peat ditches harbored less vegetation diversity and exhibited lower species turnover and different community composition, driven by variation in soil conditions and catchment size. Our study demonstrates that plant species diversity and richness increase with catchment area along a ditch to stream gradient, highlighting a pattern well established in natural systems but underexplored in the context of artificial and modified waterways. To enhance vegetation diversity in boreal landscapes, conservation planning should include modified waterways on till soils. Management recommendations include avoiding ditch maintenance in self-eroding till systems and prioritizing the rewetting of sites with peat ditches and small catchments. Rather than a uniform restoration approach, our results advocate for catchment-scale planning and tailored ecological endpoints to maximize biodiversity and ecosystem resilience.

Place, publisher, year, edition, pages
John Wiley & Sons, 2026. Vol. 17, no 5, article id e70665
Keywords [en]
artificial waterways, ditch network maintenance, meta-community dynamics, modified streams, novel ecosystems, riparian
National Category
Ecology
Identifiers
URN: urn:nbn:se:umu:diva-253475DOI: 10.1002/ecs2.70665ISI: 001765929000001Scopus ID: 2-s2.0-105039062379OAI: oai:DiVA.org:umu-253475DiVA, id: diva2:2062072
Funder
Swedish Research Council, 2021-01672Swedish Research Council, 2021-02114Swedish Research Council, 2022-02107Swedish Research Council, 2023-00284The Kempe FoundationsKnut and Alice Wallenberg FoundationAvailable from: 2026-05-25 Created: 2026-05-25 Last updated: 2026-05-25Bibliographically approved

Open Access in DiVA

fulltext(15695 kB)41 downloads
File information
File name FULLTEXT01.pdfFile size 15695 kBChecksum SHA-512
90fd1be8df683bdc92472169dde6b6f58b2e7472e90c6293b66e4ca5a5d1fd77813c40381ede1d672ebfe47a2a48ebea445ba384a94bc6c9b4e3c412f6845f75
Type fulltextMimetype application/pdf

Other links

Publisher's full textScopus

Authority records

Sponseller, Ryan A.

Search in DiVA

By author/editor
Sponseller, Ryan A.
By organisation
Department of Ecology and Environmental Sciences
In the same journal
Ecosphere
Ecology

Search outside of DiVA

GoogleGoogle Scholar
The number of downloads is the sum of all downloads of full texts. It may include eg previous versions that are now no longer available

doi
urn-nbn

Altmetric score

doi
urn-nbn
Total: 66 hits
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf