Umeå University's logo

umu.sePublications
Change search
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf
Can AI applied on MRI reliably predict shunt response in INPH?: A comprehensive exploration of deep learning and radiomics approaches using preoperative MRI
Umeå University, Faculty of Medicine, Department of Diagnostics and Intervention.ORCID iD: 0009-0004-6341-8444
Unit of Artificial Intelligence and Computer Systems, Department of Engineering, Università Campus Bio-Medico di Roma, Rome, Italy.
Umeå University, Faculty of Medicine, Department of Diagnostics and Intervention.ORCID iD: 0000-0002-7712-5907
Umeå University, Faculty of Medicine, Department of Clinical Sciences, Neurosciences.
Show others and affiliations
2026 (English)In: PLOS ONE, E-ISSN 1932-6203, Vol. 21, no 6, article id e0350335Article in journal (Refereed) Published
Abstract [en]

Objective: Idiopathic normal pressure hydrocephalus (INPH) is a treatable neurological condition, yet predicting which patients will benefit from a cerebrospinal fluid shunt remains challenging. Structural brain MRI is a core part of the diagnostic workup, but traditional radiological measures show limited predictive accuracy. This study aimed to assess whether deep learning and radiomics-based machine learning approaches can provide clinically useful predictions of shunt outcome based on preoperative MRI.

Methods: We investigated 149 shunted INPH patients with available preoperative T1-weighted, T2-weighted, and FLAIR images. Patients were classified as responders (n = 113) or non-responders (n = 36) based on postoperative gait speed improvement. For INPH, this is a large sample with typical outcome distribution. Three artificial intelligence approaches were tested: a late-fusion ensemble of multiple 3D convolutional neural networks; a multimodal intermediate fusion model; and radiomics-based machine learning models trained on features extracted from whole-brain masks. Models were assessed using 10-fold cross-validation. The best performing model on the validation set was selected from each approach. Performance metrics included the area under the receiving operating characteristic curve (AUROC), sensitivity, and specificity.

Results: Performance was considered poor in all models, and none reached an area under the receiving operating characteristic curve above 70%. Of the three methodologies, the best performance was achieved with a radiomics-based model (Linear Discriminant Analysis classifier on T1-weighted images) which achieved an AUROC of 63.7%. In a reduced subset of clearly separated responders and non-responders (n = 72), the best model (late fusion ensemble of 5 convolutional neural networks) reached an AUROC of 69.2%.

Conclusions: Despite the use of advanced artificial intelligence techniques, structural MRI alone were insufficient for reliably predicting gait outcome after surgery in idiopathic normal pressure hydrocephalus. To capture the complexity of the condition and enable clinically meaningful predictions, our findings indicate the need for research investigating multimodal input and using large multi-center datasets.

Place, publisher, year, edition, pages
Public Library of Science (PLoS), 2026. Vol. 21, no 6, article id e0350335
National Category
Radiology and Medical Imaging Neurology
Identifiers
URN: urn:nbn:se:umu:diva-254917DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0350335PubMedID: 42258503Scopus ID: 2-s2.0-105041110196OAI: oai:DiVA.org:umu-254917DiVA, id: diva2:2073956
Funder
National Academic Infrastructure for Supercomputing in Sweden (NAISS)Swedish National Infrastructure for Computing (SNIC)Available from: 2026-06-17 Created: 2026-06-17 Last updated: 2026-06-17Bibliographically approved

Open Access in DiVA

fulltext(1203 kB)9 downloads
File information
File name FULLTEXT01.pdfFile size 1203 kBChecksum SHA-512
e454063f8ee390bcd32789b53c1329a7bd8496fbd23093684933364215268e2b043d4b825ab800ef67661be1d206c7a22312a164d508291324a34f6a9d6a0216
Type fulltextMimetype application/pdf

Other links

Publisher's full textPubMedScopus

Authority records

Mogensen, KlaraBehndig, SofiaEriksson De Ryst, JohanSoda, PaoloEklund, AndersMalm, JanQvarlander, Sara

Search in DiVA

By author/editor
Mogensen, KlaraBehndig, SofiaEriksson De Ryst, JohanSoda, PaoloEklund, AndersMalm, JanQvarlander, Sara
By organisation
Department of Diagnostics and InterventionNeurosciencesUmeå Centre for Functional Brain Imaging (UFBI)
In the same journal
PLOS ONE
Radiology and Medical ImagingNeurology

Search outside of DiVA

GoogleGoogle Scholar
The number of downloads is the sum of all downloads of full texts. It may include eg previous versions that are now no longer available

doi
pubmed
urn-nbn

Altmetric score

doi
pubmed
urn-nbn
Total: 96 hits
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf