Umeå University's logo

umu.sePublications
Change search
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf
Leader perspectives on implementing Time Together: a qualitative process evaluation using the Consolidated Framework for Implementation Research
Umeå University, Faculty of Medicine, Department of Nursing.ORCID iD: 0000-0002-0735-8473
Umeå University, Faculty of Medicine, Department of Nursing.ORCID iD: 0000-0002-3360-5589
Umeå University, Faculty of Medicine, Department of Community Medicine and Rehabilitation, Section of Occupational Therapy.ORCID iD: 0000-0002-8265-5769
Umeå University, Faculty of Medicine, Department of Epidemiology and Global Health.ORCID iD: 0000-0002-8428-974x
Show others and affiliations
2026 (English)In: BMJ Open, E-ISSN 2044-6055, Vol. 16, no 6, article id e117894Article in journal (Refereed) Published
Abstract [en]

Objectives: Time Together (TT) is a nursing intervention designed with a focus on increasing the possibility of patients and staff engaging in joint activities. Previous research points towards implementation difficulties but there are no studies specifically investigating the process of implementing TT in psychiatric inpatient care (PIC). Therefore, the aim of this study is to explore mid-level leaders’ and implementation leads’ perspectives on implementing TT in PIC, analysed through the Consolidated Framework for Implementation Research (CFIR).

Design: This qualitative study used semistructured interviews with 11 mid-level leaders and implementation leads who took part in implementing TT. The interviews were analysed using deductive qualitative content analysis, with the CFIR applied as a structured matrix in the analysis. 

Setting: The study was conducted in PIC settings at three wards within secondary care healthcare services in northern Sweden.

Participants: Participants were 11 mid-level leaders and implementation leads involved in the implementation of TT in PIC.

Interventions: TT is scheduled for 1 hour, 5 days a week. During this hour, nursing staff and patients engage in joint activities, while one or two staff members oversee administrative duties. No meetings, visits or other ward-related activities are scheduled during this hour.

Results: Deductive content analysis resulted in 15 categories sorted into 4 domains and 11 constructs. TT was perceived as advantageous and aligned with the wards’ mission. However, one key finding was that mid-level leaders and implementation leads found implementation challenging as they perceived that some innovation deliverers viewed joint activities within TT as lacking value and not being ‘proper work’. Furthermore, there was a need for more information and a clearer rationale for the intervention in order to improve implementation and delivery.

Conclusions: The findings indicate a discrepancy in values and attitudes between leaders and innovation deliverers regarding what constitutes meaningful care in psychiatric inpatient settings. Implementation was further influenced by challenges related to leadership and motivating others. Barriers to implementing TT may not be addressable through implementation and intervention training alone. Instead, implementation planning should also consider intervention deliverers’ values and beliefs.

Place, publisher, year, edition, pages
BMJ Publishing Group Ltd, 2026. Vol. 16, no 6, article id e117894
Keywords [en]
Hospitals, Implementation Science, Mental health, Nursing Care, Qualitative research, Quality Improvement
National Category
Health Care Service and Management, Health Policy and Services and Health Economy Nursing
Identifiers
URN: urn:nbn:se:umu:diva-256660DOI: 10.1136/bmjopen-2026-117894ISI: 001807039500001PubMedID: 42342400Scopus ID: 2-s2.0-105043380028OAI: oai:DiVA.org:umu-256660DiVA, id: diva2:2086432
Available from: 2026-07-14 Created: 2026-07-14 Last updated: 2026-09-03Bibliographically approved
In thesis
1. Implementing Time Together in psychiatric and forensic inpatient care: practice and process
Open this publication in new window or tab >>Implementing Time Together in psychiatric and forensic inpatient care: practice and process
2026 (English)Doctoral thesis, comprehensive summary (Other academic)
Alternative title[sv]
Implementering av Tid Tillsammans i psykiatrisk och rättspsykiatrisk heldygnsvård : praktik och process
Abstract [en]

Background: Therapeutic relationships are central to psychiatric and mental health nursing, yet patients in psychiatric inpatient care (PIC) and forensic inpatient care (FIC) commonly describe nursing professionals (NPs) as unavailable and report limited interaction, boredom, and a lack of meaningful activities. Joint activities may provide opportunities for interaction and relationship building and thereby address some of these challenges. Time Together (TT) is a nursing intervention designed to create dedicated time for patients and NPs to engage in joint activities. Previous research has reported positive experiences of TT among both patients and NPs, but knowledge about its implementation, sustained engagement, and participation in everyday practice remains limited.

Aim: The overall aim of this thesis was to increase understanding of TT in PIC and FIC, with a particular focus on its relational foundations, implementation, and participation in everyday practice.

Methods: The thesis comprises four studies using qualitative and mixed methods approaches. Study I explored the meaning of participating in joint activities with patients through narrative interviews with NPs (n=14) in PIC. Data were analysed using phenomenological hermeneutics. Study II explored perspectives on implementing TT through individual, dyadic, and group interviews with mid-level leaders and implementation leads (n=11) in PIC. Data were analysed using deductive qualitative content analysis guided by the Consolidated Framework for Implementation Research (CFIR). Study III used a mixed methods design to investigate innovation deliverers’ perspectives on factors affecting implementation of TT in FIC. A CFIR-based questionnaire completed by NPs (n=23) was analysed descriptively, followed by interviews with NPs (n=9) analysed using directed content analysis. The quantitative and qualitative findings were subsequently integrated. Study IV explored how participation was negotiated and shaped within TT in FIC through participant observations and informal interviews involving NPs (n=21) and patients (n=6). Observations were conducted on 21 occasions for a total of 63 hours, and data were analysed using inductive qualitative content analysis.

Findings: Joint activities held relational meaning for NPs and were understood as a process of learning that involved navigating uncertainty, discovering aspects of the other, finding opportunities for personal growth, and meeting one another as persons beyond the formal roles of patient and NP. Findings related to TT as a structured intervention showed that its perceived advantage, adaptability, design, and the knowledge and understanding of those involved influenced its implementation. Across PIC and FIC, implementation was further shaped by organisational conditions, leadership, culture, resources, engagement among NPs, and the implementation process. Planning, follow-up, and opportunities for reflection were important, while the perceived importance of implementation determinants did not always correspond to their presence in practice. Participation in TT was negotiated between autonomy and control and shaped through relational engagement, everyday circumstances, and spatial conditions. Across the studies, the findings point to an interplay between structure and relational practice. TT can create and protect opportunities for joint activities, but structure alone does not ensure that its core component of active NP-patient interaction is realised in practice.

Conclusion: Joint activities can provide opportunities for patients and NPs to meet beyond their formal roles and develop relationships through shared everyday experiences. TT can provide a structure for creating and protecting such opportunities, but whether its core component is realised in practice depends on how the intervention is implemented and how patients and NPs engage with one another in everyday practice. The implementation and use of TT in PIC and FIC therefore require attention both to organisational conditions and to the relational practices through which opportunities for active NP-patient interaction are realised.

Place, publisher, year, edition, pages
Umeå: Umeå University, 2026. p. 77
Series
Umeå University medical dissertations, ISSN 0346-6612 ; 2440
Keywords
forensic inpatient care, implementation, joint activities, participation, psychiatric and mental health nursing, psychiatric inpatient care, Therapeutic relationships, Time Together
National Category
Nursing
Research subject
Caring Sciences
Identifiers
urn:nbn:se:umu:diva-258480 (URN)978-91-6850-144-4 (ISBN)978-91-6850-143-7 (ISBN)
Public defence
2026-10-02, Aula Biologica, Biology building, Umeå University, Umeå, 09:00 (Swedish)
Opponent
Supervisors
Available from: 2026-09-11 Created: 2026-09-03 Last updated: 2026-09-04Bibliographically approved

Open Access in DiVA

fulltext(284 kB)28 downloads
File information
File name FULLTEXT01.pdfFile size 284 kBChecksum SHA-512
35645fd407309ae185885b8c97ea0eaa2a6214ff8e7586487ff7d189c0d90eaaa8399528a36355b2593fcdbcc154de26d554c0a1efe58d8ccc0b7424a0469506
Type fulltextMimetype application/pdf

Other links

Publisher's full textPubMedScopus

Authority records

Glantz, AndreasLindgren, Britt-MarieNilsson, IngeborgWesterlund, AnnaHällgren Graneheim, UllaMolin, Jenny

Search in DiVA

By author/editor
Glantz, AndreasLindgren, Britt-MarieNilsson, IngeborgWesterlund, AnnaHällgren Graneheim, UllaMolin, Jenny
By organisation
Department of NursingSection of Occupational TherapyDepartment of Epidemiology and Global HealthPsychiatry
In the same journal
BMJ Open
Health Care Service and Management, Health Policy and Services and Health EconomyNursing

Search outside of DiVA

GoogleGoogle Scholar
The number of downloads is the sum of all downloads of full texts. It may include eg previous versions that are now no longer available

doi
pubmed
urn-nbn

Altmetric score

doi
pubmed
urn-nbn
Total: 316 hits
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf