Umeå University's logo

umu.sePublications
System disruptions
There are recurring service disruptions on some of the search portals due to high traffic. We are working to resolve the issue, you may temporarily encounter an error message.
Change search
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf
The influence mechanism of OBE-CDIO integration on engineering literacy: an empirical study based on student perceptions
Nanjing Forestry University, Nanjing, China.
Nanjing Forestry University, Nanjing, China.
Nanjing Forestry University, Nanjing, China.
Nanjing Forestry University, Nanjing, China.
Show others and affiliations
2026 (English)In: Frontiers in Psychology, E-ISSN 1664-1078, Vol. 17, article id 1812059Article in journal (Refereed) Published
Abstract [en]

Introduction – Engineering education is shifting from knowledge transmission to competence construction. The integration of Outcome-Based Education (OBE) and Conceive-Design-Implement-Operate (CDIO) represents this direction, yet research lacks empirical examination of the complete student perception-psychological process-competence chain. This study constructs an integrated model to explore how students’ perceived OBE-CDIO environment quality influences engineering literacy development through its multidimensional structure.

Methods – A cross-sectional research design was employed, administering a retrospective questionnaire survey to 366 graduates from a Double First-Class university in China who had experienced the OBE-CDIO integrated curriculum. Structural Equation Modeling (SEM) was used for higher-order factor analysis and path testing. Core constructs included: Integrated Education Environment Quality (a second-order latent variable measured by Curriculum Objective Alignment X1, Practical Project Richness X2, and Perception of Dual-Qualification Faculty Ratio X3) and Integrated Engineering Literacy (a higher-order latent variable comprising two first-order factors: Cognitive Internalization Literacy and Practical Externalization Literacy).

Results – The measurement model demonstrated excellent fit (χ2/df = 2.41, CFI = 0.962, TLI = 0.957, RMSEA = 0.062). The higher-order structural equation model revealed a strong total effect of integrated education environment quality on integrated engineering literacy (β = 0.72, p < 0.001). Mediation path analysis uncovered a key mechanism: environmental quality significantly enhanced students’ cognitive internalization literacy (β = 0.65), which in turn strongly drove the development of their practical externalization literacy (β = 0.80). Among the three dimensions of environmental quality, curriculum objective alignment (β = 0.282) contributed the most, followed by practical project richness (β = 0.222) and perception of dual-qualification faculty ratio (β = 0.170). In the sequential mediation model (Model B), total effect decomposition revealed that curriculum objective alignment had the largest total effect on practical externalization literacy (0.458), followed by practical project richness (0.426) and dual-qualification faculty ratio (0.395).

Conclusion – OBE-CDIO integration constructs an empowering environment where clear objectives promote knowledge internalization, which transforms into practical competencies under project and faculty guidance. This provides an empirically-based, stage-specific mechanism map for student-centered and outcome-oriented engineering education reform. The study offers a student-centered psychological perspective, bridging the gap between macro-level educational design and micro-level competence development in engineering education.

Place, publisher, year, edition, pages
Frontiers Media S.A., 2026. Vol. 17, article id 1812059
Keywords [en]
cognitive-behavioral mechanism, educational environment quality, engineering literacy development, OBE-CDIO integrated education, structural equation modeling
National Category
Pedagogy
Identifiers
URN: urn:nbn:se:umu:diva-257083DOI: 10.3389/fpsyg.2026.1812059ISI: 001791016500001PubMedID: 42293897Scopus ID: 2-s2.0-105042317630OAI: oai:DiVA.org:umu-257083DiVA, id: diva2:2090140
Available from: 2026-08-06 Created: 2026-08-06 Last updated: 2026-08-06Bibliographically approved

Open Access in DiVA

fulltext(1328 kB)22 downloads
File information
File name FULLTEXT01.pdfFile size 1328 kBChecksum SHA-512
9f2b6105851d7f5770cad7bd0e382450b511acb62f13f27707384c99f29b2ed1766e1982b4e38abbe80354c2bfe3706ded449fcfd3c4507cec5aabd584537ccf
Type fulltextMimetype application/pdf

Other links

Publisher's full textPubMedScopus

Authority records

Cui, Peng

Search in DiVA

By author/editor
Cui, Peng
By organisation
Department of Applied Physics and Electronics
In the same journal
Frontiers in Psychology
Pedagogy

Search outside of DiVA

GoogleGoogle Scholar
The number of downloads is the sum of all downloads of full texts. It may include eg previous versions that are now no longer available

doi
pubmed
urn-nbn

Altmetric score

doi
pubmed
urn-nbn
Total: 1420 hits
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf