Umeå University's logo

umu.sePublications
Change search
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf
Online tribes and digital authority: what can social theory bring to digital archaeology?
Umeå University, Faculty of Social Sciences, Department of Sociology. (DIGSUM)ORCID iD: 0000-0001-8848-4182
Umeå University, Faculty of Social Sciences, Department of Sociology. (DIGSUM)ORCID iD: 0000-0001-6289-9427
2017 (English)In: Open Archaeology, E-ISSN 2300-6560, Vol. 3, no 1, p. 139-148Article in journal (Refereed) Published
Abstract [en]

From early discussions of the disruptive potential of computer technologies for archaeological applications, to the present era of digital archaeology as the technical underpinning of modern archaeological practice, we have continued to debate the potential impacts of digital communication and digital capture and storage on our knowledge, profession and communications. The increased use of digital tools and methods for archaeological research and dissemination, as well as what Roosevelt (2015) has referred to as the shift to the digital paradigm within archaeological practice, leads us to suggest that the impact of this paradigm shift requires careful and critical examination. This article will examine the edges of the disciplines of archaeology and sociology, where we aim to advance our understanding of the relationship between digital technologies and archaeological knowledge from a uniquely social perspective, using the theoretical approaches of both classic and modern sociologists. The application of this lens of sociology to digital archaeology equips us to understand how archaeology and archaeological practice is situated in a social world, which is especially relevant in the Global West, where digital technology is ubiquitous. Through a critical consideration of the complexity of use of digital technologies within digital archaeology, we can begin to shift our focus away from the character and method of tools and workflow, to the background of intellectual power and influence. 

Place, publisher, year, edition, pages
Warsaw: De Gruyter Open, 2017. Vol. 3, no 1, p. 139-148
Keywords [en]
sociology, digital archaeology, social media, theory, archaeological practice
National Category
Information Systems, Social aspects Information Systems, Social aspects
Research subject
Archaeology; media and communication studies
Identifiers
URN: urn:nbn:se:umu:diva-139939DOI: 10.1515/opar-2017-0008Scopus ID: 2-s2.0-85043538880OAI: oai:DiVA.org:umu-139939DiVA, id: diva2:1144712
Available from: 2017-09-27 Created: 2017-09-27 Last updated: 2025-02-17Bibliographically approved

Open Access in DiVA

fulltext(214 kB)396 downloads
File information
File name FULLTEXT02.pdfFile size 214 kBChecksum SHA-512
ee4de2f1ec422089ee80fe347815a16d0fc05f1569f4be823090044dbaad32cc0bdb426d8d262fe0c1182a4c3fa5c925fe92f54a1acd4391397d1385b0c66683
Type fulltextMimetype application/pdf

Other links

Publisher's full textScopus

Authority records

Richardson, Lorna-JaneLindgren, Simon

Search in DiVA

By author/editor
Richardson, Lorna-JaneLindgren, Simon
By organisation
Department of Sociology
In the same journal
Open Archaeology
Information Systems, Social aspectsInformation Systems, Social aspects

Search outside of DiVA

GoogleGoogle Scholar
Total: 398 downloads
The number of downloads is the sum of all downloads of full texts. It may include eg previous versions that are now no longer available

doi
urn-nbn

Altmetric score

doi
urn-nbn
Total: 772 hits
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf