Umeå University's logo

umu.sePublications
Change search
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf
Deep brain stimulation for obsessive-compulsive disorder: knowledge and concerns among psychiatrists, psychotherapists and patients
Umeå University, Faculty of Medicine, Department of Clinical Sciences, Psychiatry. Umeå University, Faculty of Medicine, Department of Pharmacology and Clinical Neuroscience, Clinical Neuroscience.
Umeå University, Faculty of Medicine, Department of Pharmacology and Clinical Neuroscience, Clinical Neuroscience.
Umeå University, Faculty of Medicine, Department of Pharmacology and Clinical Neuroscience, Clinical Neuroscience.
Umeå University, Faculty of Medicine, Department of Clinical Sciences, Psychiatry.
2017 (English)In: Surgical Neurology International, ISSN 2229-5097, E-ISSN 2152-7806, Vol. 8, article id 298Article in journal (Refereed) Published
Abstract [en]

Background: Deep brain stimulation (DBS) is under investigation for severe obsessive-compulsive disorder (OCD) resistant to other therapies. The number of implants worldwide is slowly increasing. Therefore, it is of importance to explore knowledge and concerns of this novel treatment among patients and their psychiatric healthcare contacts. This information is relevant for scientific professionals working with clinical studies for DBS for this indication. Especially, for future study designs and the creation of information targeting healthcare professionals and patients. The aim of this study was to explore the knowledge and concerns toward DBS among patients with OCD, psychiatrists, and cognitive behavioral therapists.

Methods: The study was conducted through web-based surveys for the aimed target groups -psychiatrist, patients, and cognitive behavioral therapists. The surveys contained questions regarding previous knowledge of DBS, source of knowledge, attitudes, and concerns towards the therapy.

Results: The main source of information was from scientific sources among psychiatrists and psychotherapists. The patient's main source of information was the media. Common concerns among the groups included complications from surgery, anesthesia, stimulation side effects, and the novelty of the treatment. Specific concerns for the groups included; personality changes mentioned by patients and psychotherapists, and ethical concerns among psychiatrists.

Conclusion: There are challenges for DBS in OCD as identified by the participants of this study; source and quality of information, efficacy, potential adverse effects, and eligibility. In all of which the current evidence base still is limited. A broad research agenda is needed for studies going forward.

Place, publisher, year, edition, pages
Medknow Publications, 2017. Vol. 8, article id 298
Keywords [en]
attitude, deep brain stimulation, obsessive-compulsive disorder, patient, psychiatrist, psychotherapist
National Category
Psychiatry
Identifiers
URN: urn:nbn:se:umu:diva-146475DOI: 10.4103/SNI.SNI_19_17PubMedID: 29285414Scopus ID: 2-s2.0-85055511304OAI: oai:DiVA.org:umu-146475DiVA, id: diva2:1196500
Available from: 2018-04-10 Created: 2018-04-10 Last updated: 2025-02-25Bibliographically approved
In thesis
1. Deep brain stimulation in obsessive-compulsive disorder
Open this publication in new window or tab >>Deep brain stimulation in obsessive-compulsive disorder
2021 (English)Doctoral thesis, comprehensive summary (Other academic)
Abstract [en]

Deep brain stimulation (DBS) is under investigation for severe obsessive-compulsive disorder (OCD) resistant to other therapies. As a crucial part of the anxiety circuit in the brain, the bed nucleus of stria terminalis (BNST) has been proposed as a target for DBS in OCD. However, the mechanism of action of BNST DBS in OCD is not yet fully understood. In our studies, the aim was to evaluate the effect and side effects of DBS in the BNST in severe OCD, to investigate which anatomical areas are being affected by the stimulation and what could be the potential mechanism of action of DBS in this target. We also explored the knowledge and concerns regarding DBS in OCD among psychiatrists, psychotherapists and patients suffering from the disorder. We investigate clinical outcomes and safety of DBS in the BNST in a series of 11 participants with severe therapy-refractory OCD. The primary outcome was a change in the Yale-Brown Obsessive-Compulsive Scale (YBOCS) scores one year after surgery. Using image and stimulation parameter data from the study above, we investigate through participant-specific simulation of the electric field, which anatomical areas are affected by the electric field, and if this can be related to the clinical results. Six of the participants were evaluated with symptom provocation fMRI pre-operatively and in DBS ON and OFF conditions. A web-based study surveyed psychiatrists, patients, and cognitive-behavioural therapists regarding previous knowledge of DBS, source of knowledge, attitudes, and concerns towards the therapy.

At baseline, the mean±SD YBOCS score was 33±3.0. One year after DBS, mean±SD YBOCS score was 20±4.8 (38% improvement (range 10- 60%) p <0.01). Of the 11 participants, six were considered responders (decrease in YBOCS ≥35%) and four partial responders (decrease in YBOCS 25-34%). Surgical adverse events included one case of skin infection leading to reimplantation. The most common transient stimulation-related side-effects were anxiety and insomnia. The individual electric stimulation fields by stimulation in the BNST were similar at the 12 and 24-months follow up, involving mainly the anterior limb of the internal capsule (ALIC), genu of the internal capsule, BNST, fornix, anteromedial globus pallidus externa (GPe) and the anterior commissure. A statistically significant correlation (p < 0.05) between clinical effect measured by the YBOCS and simulation was found at the 12-month follow-up in the ventral ALIC and anteromedial GPe. A significant decrease in anxiety-related brain activity in the pre-supplementary motor area (pre-SMA) and the anterior insula was seen in 3/6 participants, with a comparable reduction (below significance level) in the other three participants. Results from the survey found that the primary source of information was from scientific sources among psychiatrists and psychotherapists. The patients' primary source of information was the media. Common concerns among the groups included complications from surgery, anaesthesia, stimulation side effects, and the novelty of the treatment. Specific concerns for the groups included; personality changes mentioned by patients and psychotherapists and ethical concerns among psychiatrists.

BNST DBS is a promising therapy in severe therapy-refractory OCD. Our results are in line with previous publications regarding effect and safety profiles. We hypothesise that possible mechanisms of BNST DBS in OCD could be modulation of anxiety-related activity in the pre-SMA and anterior insula, two regions that play an important role in the pathophysiology of OCD. Many of the targets under investigation for OCD are in anatomical proximity, and as seen in our study, offtarget effects overlap. Therefore, DBS in the region of ALIC, NA, and BNST may perhaps be considered to be stimulation of the same target. DBS challenges in obsessive-compulsive disorder consist of source and quality of information, potential long-term adverse effects and eligibility. A broad research agenda is needed for studies as we advance in this field.

Place, publisher, year, edition, pages
Umeå: Umeå universitet, 2021. p. 84
Series
Umeå University medical dissertations, ISSN 0346-6612 ; 2169
Keywords
deep brain stimulation (DBS), obsessive-compulsive disorder (OCD)
National Category
Psychiatry
Research subject
Psychiatry
Identifiers
urn:nbn:se:umu:diva-187802 (URN)978-91-7855-654-0 (ISBN)978-91-7855-655-7 (ISBN)
Public defence
2021-10-15, Sal A, målpunkt F0, plan 0, Psykiatriska kliniken, NUS, 09:00 (English)
Opponent
Supervisors
Note

Serietillhörighet saknas i publikationen.

Available from: 2021-09-24 Created: 2021-09-21 Last updated: 2024-07-02Bibliographically approved

Open Access in DiVA

fulltext(362 kB)672 downloads
File information
File name FULLTEXT01.pdfFile size 362 kBChecksum SHA-512
ce40093fd4cd69aec7c2b854c571dfaece53ad3c1ad5b733aa7a1aa2584db466318d7a7d06bfcc594419a54da0b589b52574c012c4da9a8a2c5298f55d8c3b59
Type fulltextMimetype application/pdf

Other links

Publisher's full textPubMedScopusPublisher's full text

Authority records

Naesström, MatildaBlomstedt, PatricHariz, MarwanBodlund, Owe

Search in DiVA

By author/editor
Naesström, MatildaBlomstedt, PatricHariz, MarwanBodlund, Owe
By organisation
PsychiatryClinical Neuroscience
In the same journal
Surgical Neurology International
Psychiatry

Search outside of DiVA

GoogleGoogle Scholar
Total: 673 downloads
The number of downloads is the sum of all downloads of full texts. It may include eg previous versions that are now no longer available

doi
pubmed
urn-nbn

Altmetric score

doi
pubmed
urn-nbn
Total: 1173 hits
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf