Umeå University's logo

umu.sePublications
Change search
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf
Advanced High-Strength Steel and Carbon Fiber Reinforced Polymer Composite Body in White for Passenger Cars: Environmental Performance and Sustainable Return on Investment under Different Propulsion Modes
Umeå University, Faculty of Science and Technology, Department of Chemistry.
Show others and affiliations
2019 (English)In: ACS Sustainable Chemistry and Engineering, E-ISSN 2168-0485, Vol. 7, no 5, p. 4951-4963Article in journal (Refereed) Published
Abstract [en]

Vehicle lightweighting strategies must deliver sustainable returns to customers and society. This work evaluates the sustainable return on investment (SROI) of lightweighted advanced high strength steel (AHSS) and carbon fiber reinforced polymer (CFRP)-intensive multimaterial bodies in white (BIWs) for automobiles. The SROI depends on the lightweighted BIW's manufacturing cost and the difference in sustainable cost between a baseline (mild steel) BIW and the lightweighted alternative. The sustainable cost is the sum of the customer's lifetime fuel (or electricity) costs and the costs of environmental externalities. A cradle-to-grave life cycle assessment (LCA) was conducted to quantify the environmental impacts of CFRP and AHSS BIWs in gasoline-fueled cars, bioethanol (E85)-fueled cars, and battery electric vehicles (BEVs) driven for a lifetime distance of 200 000 km. For cars fueled with gasoline- or corn-based bioethanol, the CFRP BIW yielded the lowest SROI; the AHSS BIW performed best for BEVs and cars fueled with wood bioethanol. However, the commercial availability of recycled carbon fiber should increase the SROI of the CFRP BIW in the future. Additionally, the SROI of CFRP BIWs is maximized when carbon fiber production is done using energy from a low carbon-intensity electric grid or decentralized sources such as waste-to-energy incineration plants.

Place, publisher, year, edition, pages
AMER CHEMICAL SOC , 2019. Vol. 7, no 5, p. 4951-4963
Keywords [en]
Carbon fiber reinforced polymer composites (CFRP), Advanced high strength steel (AHSS), Automotive dy in white, Automotive lightweighting Environmental performance, Sustainable return on vestment, Woody or corn bioethanol, Battery electric vehicle (BEV)
National Category
Energy Engineering
Identifiers
URN: urn:nbn:se:umu:diva-157515DOI: 10.1021/acssuschemeng.8b05588ISI: 000460600500042Scopus ID: 2-s2.0-85061914090OAI: oai:DiVA.org:umu-157515DiVA, id: diva2:1302560
Projects
Bio4Energy
Funder
Bio4EnergyAvailable from: 2019-04-05 Created: 2019-04-05 Last updated: 2023-03-24Bibliographically approved
In thesis
1. Circularity Assessment of Water and Waste in Cities: A Proposed Framework for Sustainable Performance Evaluation using LCA and LCC
Open this publication in new window or tab >>Circularity Assessment of Water and Waste in Cities: A Proposed Framework for Sustainable Performance Evaluation using LCA and LCC
2021 (English)Doctoral thesis, comprehensive summary (Other academic)
Abstract [en]

Urbanization is a global phenomenon, happening on a massive scale and at a rapid rate, with 68% of the planet’s population predicted to be living in cities by 2050 (UN-DESA, 2018). The sustainability of a city (Goal 11 of UN SDGs) undergoing rapid urbanization depends on its ability to maintain a low consumption of resources and materials at any given time (referred to as the urban metabolic rate), whilst simultaneously providing essential municipal services to its inhabitants, such as a water supply, wastewater treatment and solid waste management. The latter must comply with circular economy principles, meaning recovery of byproducts, prevention of discharge of toxic pollutants, and avoidance of landfill usage. The appended papers in the thesis (Papers I–V) describe sustainable assessments of wastewater and waste services to increase their degree of circularity, using tools such as Life Cycle Assessment (LCA) and Life Cycle Costing (LCC). Paper I describes the environmental performance of using the biogas from a Wastewater Treatment Plant (WWTP) and converting it to Liquefied Biomethane (LBM), which can used as fuel in Tractor-Trailers (TT). Overall, the study suggests that changing from diesel to LBM fuel improves the environmental performance of TT. However, the magnitude of environmental benefit depends on an alternate source of electricity required for operation of the WWTP. Paper II evaluates the Social Cost-Benefit Analysis (SCBA) of Compressed Biomethane (CBM) obtained from a food waste digestion plant in Mumbai, India for use as a fuel in transit buses. SCBA results indicate that the food waste-based CBM model can save 6.86 billion Indian rupees (99.4 million USD) annually for Mumbai. Paper III describes the Sustainable Return on Investment (SROI) of lightweight Advanced High Strength Steel (AHSS) and Carbon Fiber Reinforced Polymer (CFRP) intensive multi-material Body in White (BIW) for automobiles. The SROI of CFRP BIWs is maximized when carbon fiber production uses energy from a low carbon-intensity electric grid or decentralized sources such as waste-to-energy incineration plants. Paper IV assesses the ecoefficiency of a thermal insulation panel that consists of a Polyurethane (PU) foam core sandwiched between two epoxy composite skins, prepared by reinforcing Glass Fibers (GF) and SFA (Silanized Fly Ash) in epoxy resin. The results revealed that the ecoefficiency of the composite panels is positive (47%) and superior to that of market incumbent alternatives with PU foam or rockwool cores and steel skins. Paper V quantifies the Total Cost to Society (TCS) (sum of private cost and environmental externalities cost) of a centralized urban WWTP, including the operation as well as byproduct utilization stream. The environmental performance and circular compliance are both factored in, when determining the TCS of a WWTP. The results revealed savings of 1.064 million USD, which include direct and indirect revenues to the plant, as well as avoidance costs attributed to environmental externalities. Based on the studies described in4these papers, a five-stage assessment framework for determining the overall sustainability performance of essential treatment services in a city is proposed in this thesis. The framework considers the combined effect of urban metabolic features and initiatives aimed at improving circular compliance of essential services.

Place, publisher, year, edition, pages
umeå: Umeå University, 2021. p. 70
Keywords
Life cycle assessment, life cycle costing, environmental externalities cost, sustainable city, circularity, wastewater treatment, organic waste, waste to energy, assessment framework
National Category
Natural Sciences
Research subject
environmental science
Identifiers
urn:nbn:se:umu:diva-182194 (URN)978-91-7855-527-7 (ISBN)978-91-7855-528-4 (ISBN)
Public defence
2021-05-10, Glasburen KBC/ Fokusrummet, KBC Linneus väg 6, 907 36, Umeå, Umeå, 09:30 (English)
Opponent
Supervisors
Available from: 2021-04-19 Created: 2021-04-12 Last updated: 2021-04-19Bibliographically approved

Open Access in DiVA

No full text in DiVA

Other links

Publisher's full textScopus

Authority records

Shanmugam, KavithaTysklind, MatsUpadhyayula, Venkata K.K.

Search in DiVA

By author/editor
Shanmugam, KavithaTysklind, MatsUpadhyayula, Venkata K.K.
By organisation
Department of Chemistry
In the same journal
ACS Sustainable Chemistry and Engineering
Energy Engineering

Search outside of DiVA

GoogleGoogle Scholar

doi
urn-nbn

Altmetric score

doi
urn-nbn
Total: 606 hits
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf