Umeå University's logo

umu.sePublications
Change search
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf
Cerebrospinal Fluid Shunting Improves Long-Term Quality of Life in Idiopathic Normal Pressure Hydrocephalus
Umeå University, Faculty of Medicine, Department of Clinical Sciences, Neurosciences.ORCID iD: 0000-0002-0125-9589
Umeå University, Faculty of Medicine, Department of Radiation Sciences, Radiation Physics. Umeå University, Faculty of Science and Technology, Centre for Biomedical Engineering and Physics (CMTF).ORCID iD: 0000-0002-2031-722X
Umeå University, Faculty of Medicine, Department of Clinical Sciences, Neurosciences.ORCID iD: 0000-0001-6451-1940
2020 (English)In: Neurosurgery, ISSN 0148-396X, E-ISSN 1524-4040, Vol. 86, no 4, p. 574-582Article in journal (Refereed) Published
Abstract [en]

BACKGROUND: The short- and long-term impact of cerebrospinal fluid shunting on quality of life (QoL) in idiopathic normal pressure hydrocephalus (INPH) is poorly understood.

OBJECTIVE: To investigate QoL in shunted INPH patients compared to the population and to investigate which factors influence QoL in INPH.

METHODS: INPH patients consecutively shunted in Sweden during 2008-2010 were scrutinized. Population-based controls were age- and sex-matched to the patients. Included participants were the following: 176 INPH patients and 368 controls. QoL was assessed using the EuroQol 5-dimension 5-level (EQ5D5L) instrument, which measures overall QoL and health status in 5 dimensions. Independency (accommodation and/or need for in-home care) and comorbidities were assessed. Patients were followed up 6-45 mo after surgery (mean follow-up time: 21 mo).

RESULTS: Shunting improved QoL (P < .001) and health status in all dimensions (P < .005). Shunted INPH patients had lower QoL than controls (P < .001). The patients' health status in mobility, self-care, daily activities, and anxiety/depression was worse than the controls both before and after surgery (P < .001). The main predictors of low QoL in INPH were symptoms of depression (P < .001) and severity of gait disturbance (P = .001). Fewer INPH patients than controls lived independently (45% vs 85%, P < .001). Time after shunting had no influence on QoL.

CONCLUSION: QoL remains improved in shunted INPH patients at a mean follow-up time of 21 mo, but the patients do not reach the same QoL as the population. Symptoms of depression and severity of gait disturbance are the strongest predictors of low QoL in INPH.

Place, publisher, year, edition, pages
Oxford University Press, 2020. Vol. 86, no 4, p. 574-582
Keywords [en]
Case-control studies, Dementia, Depression, Follow-up studies, Hydrocephalus, INPH CRASH, Normal pressure, Quality of life
National Category
Neurology
Research subject
Neurology
Identifiers
URN: urn:nbn:se:umu:diva-167309DOI: 10.1093/neuros/nyz297ISI: 000536480800028PubMedID: 31504827Scopus ID: 2-s2.0-85081900509OAI: oai:DiVA.org:umu-167309DiVA, id: diva2:1385846
Funder
Swedish Research CouncilVästerbotten County CouncilAvailable from: 2020-01-15 Created: 2020-01-15 Last updated: 2023-03-24Bibliographically approved

Open Access in DiVA

No full text in DiVA

Other links

Publisher's full textPubMedScopus

Authority records

Israelsson, HannaEklund, AndersMalm, Jan

Search in DiVA

By author/editor
Israelsson, HannaEklund, AndersMalm, Jan
By organisation
NeurosciencesRadiation PhysicsCentre for Biomedical Engineering and Physics (CMTF)
In the same journal
Neurosurgery
Neurology

Search outside of DiVA

GoogleGoogle Scholar

doi
pubmed
urn-nbn

Altmetric score

doi
pubmed
urn-nbn
Total: 343 hits
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf