Umeå University's logo

umu.sePublications
Change search
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf
Disrupting assimilationist research principles and practices in Australia and Sweden: self-determination through the enactment of Indigenous diplomacies
University of Sydney.ORCID iD: 0000-0001-8004-6284
Umeå University, Faculty of Arts, Centre for Sami Research.ORCID iD: 0000-0002-4853-9641
2019 (English)In: Seton Hall journal of diplomacy and international relations, E-ISSN 1538-6589, Vol. XXI, no 1, p. 36-53Article in journal (Refereed) Published
Abstract [en]

Embedded with pre-existing meaning and a complex set of core principles and practices, "diplomacy" is a term familiar to most. Simply put, diplomacy is the established methods of influencing the decisions and behavior of foreign governments and peoples through dialogue, negotiation, and other measures to resolve conflict and maintain peace. In this article, we review the literature pertaining to the concept of diplomacy, focusing primarily on the lesser recognized diplomacies of First Peoples in Australia and Sweden. Through the telling of three significant events, historical and contemporary, drawn from many possible examples of the two nations, we demonstrate that Indigenous diplomacies are not new but rather newly recognized. We argue for the utilization of Indigenous diplomatic practices to realize self-determining research with, and by, First Peoples. In doing so, centuries of colonization that have resulted in power imbalances, which sought to assimilate and benefit settler/colonizer privilege through its governing institutions, may be disrupted and transformed. According to the literature search undertaken, this is an approach to Indigenous research that has received scant attention. Our discussion is guided by two key questions. First, can research informed by Indigenous diplomatic practices disrupt assimilationist research agendas set predominantly by society's governing institutions? Second, can recognition of Indigenous diplomatic principles and practices facilitate self-determining research? We draw on our experiences as Indigenous and non-Indigenous researchers to suggest that the enactment of Indigenous diplomatic practices when undertaking our research 'proper ways' with First Peoples, according to Indigenous ways of knowing, being, and doing, has facilitated its success.

Place, publisher, year, edition, pages
South Orange, NJ: The School of Diplomacy and International Relations, Seton Hall University , 2019. Vol. XXI, no 1, p. 36-53
National Category
Political Science
Identifiers
URN: urn:nbn:se:umu:diva-169283OAI: oai:DiVA.org:umu-169283DiVA, id: diva2:1417792
Available from: 2020-03-30 Created: 2020-03-30 Last updated: 2020-03-30Bibliographically approved

Open Access in DiVA

No full text in DiVA

Other links

URL

Authority records

Sehlin MacNeil, Kristina

Search in DiVA

By author/editor
Daniels-Mayes, SheelaghSehlin MacNeil, Kristina
By organisation
Centre for Sami Research
Political Science

Search outside of DiVA

GoogleGoogle Scholar

urn-nbn

Altmetric score

urn-nbn
Total: 588 hits
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf