Umeå University's logo

umu.sePublications
Change search
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf
Bone Specific Drugs and Osteonecrosis of Sites Other than the Jaw: A Nationwide Cohort Study
Umeå University, Faculty of Medicine, Department of Community Medicine and Rehabilitation, Geriatric Medicine.ORCID iD: 0000-0003-2924-508X
Umeå University, Faculty of Medicine, Department of Community Medicine and Rehabilitation, Geriatric Medicine.
Umeå University, Faculty of Medicine, Department of Community Medicine and Rehabilitation, Geriatric Medicine. Umeå University, Faculty of Medicine, Department of Public Health and Clinical Medicine, Section of Sustainable Health.
Umeå University, Faculty of Medicine, Department of Public Health and Clinical Medicine, Section of Sustainable Health.ORCID iD: 0000-0002-8107-2860
Show others and affiliations
2020 (English)In: Journal of Bone and Mineral Research, ISSN 0884-0431, E-ISSN 1523-4681, Vol. 35, no 9, p. 1703-1710Article in journal (Refereed) Published
Abstract [en]

Bone specific drugs (BSDs) increase the risk of osteonecrosis of the jaw, but whether they increase the risk of osteonecrosis at other sites is not known. Two studies, a cohort study and a case-control study, were conducted using registry data on everyone who was residing in Sweden on December 31, 2005, and who was 50 years of age or older at the time (N = 3,523,912). In the cohort study, individuals prescribed a BSD during 2006-2017 (n = 217 387) were 1:1 matched with nonusers on birth year, sex, hip fracture status and Swedish or foreign origin. In the case-control study, individuals diagnosed with osteonecrosis during 2006-2017 (n = 12 614) were 1:1 matched with individuals without a diagnosis of osteonecrosis on birth year, sex, and Swedish or foreign background. In the cohort study, osteonecrosis was diagnosed in 983 BSD users and 214 nonusers (adjusted hazard ratio [aHR], 4.02; 95% CI, 3.32-4.87), during a mean treatment time of 2.8 years. A similar association was observed in a subcohort where all indivuals diagnosed with cancer (HR, 4.82, 95% CI, 2.52-9.22). The greatest difference in incidence between BSD users and nonusers was observed in patients with a femoral neck fracture that was not treated with total hip arthroplasty or hemiarthroplasty (Incidence rate difference, 77.8 cases per 10,000 person-years, p < 0.05). The risk of osteonecrosis was higher in users of denosumab (HR, 1.93; 95% CI, 1.33-2.79) and users of zoledronic acid (HR, 1.95; 95% CI, 1.31-2.91) than in users of other BSDs. The increased risk of osteonecrosis decreased after the end of therapy (p < 0.001 for time trend). The results were confirmed in the case-control study. In summary, use of BSDs, especially more potent BSDs, is associated with increased risk of osteonecrosis of sites other than the jaw. This increased risk decreases after the final dose of BSD.

Place, publisher, year, edition, pages
John Wiley & Sons, 2020. Vol. 35, no 9, p. 1703-1710
Keywords [en]
Bisphosphonates, Hip fracture, Osteonecrosis
National Category
Orthopaedics
Identifiers
URN: urn:nbn:se:umu:diva-170775DOI: 10.1002/jbmr.4040ISI: 000533442700001PubMedID: 32379370Scopus ID: 2-s2.0-85084788234OAI: oai:DiVA.org:umu-170775DiVA, id: diva2:1430445
Available from: 2020-05-15 Created: 2020-05-15 Last updated: 2023-03-24Bibliographically approved
In thesis
1. Benefits and harms of Bisphosphonates: an observational study
Open this publication in new window or tab >>Benefits and harms of Bisphosphonates: an observational study
2022 (English)Doctoral thesis, comprehensive summary (Other academic)
Alternative title[sv]
Positiva och negativa effekter av bisfosfonater : en observationsstudie
Abstract [en]

Background: Bisphosphonates are first-line treatment for osteoporosis, but osteoporosis is considered an undertreated disease. The general aim of this dissertation was to further study the benefits and harms of bisphosphonates. There were four specific research questions: (1) Do bisphosphonates reduce the risk of new fractures in older adults who have a history of fracture? (2) Do bisphosphonates reduce the risk of fracture in people taking glucocorticoids? (3) Does confounding explain why bisphosphonates are associated with lower mortality in observational studies? (4) Do bisphosphonates increase the risk of non-jaw osteonecrosis?

Methods: To answer these questions, we used Swedish register data on deaths, diagnoses, and prescription medications to conduct four matched cohort studies of bisphosphonate users and nonusers. The cohorts were selected from patients registered in the Hip Fracture Register and from all residents of Sweden who were aged 50 years or older on December 31, 2005.

Results: (1) Bisphosphonate users had an initially increased risk of sustaining new fractures, which appeared to be due to an underlying high risk of fracture. This increased risk diminished over time, which is consistent with a gradual treatment effect, but it is also consistent with a bias known as depletion of susceptibles. (2) Bisphosphonate users had a lower risk of fracture during glucocorticoid therapy. (3) Bisphosphonate users had a lower mortality rate from day 2 of treatment. Although such an early treatment effect cannot be ruled out, this finding is consistent with confounding. (4) Bisphosphonate users had an increased risk of developing non-jaw osteonecrosis. 

Conclusion: Most of the results were difficult to interpret as true benefits or harms of bisphosphonates because alternative explanations, arising from bias or confounding, were likely. The exception was the results of Study 2, where alternative explanations are more difficult to find. Therefore, Study 2 suggests that bisphosphonates reduce the risk of fractures in glucocorticoid-treated patients. Further research is needed to clarify the potential effects of bisphosphonates on mortality, non-jaw osteonecrosis, and new fractures after a previous fracture.

Place, publisher, year, edition, pages
Umeå: Umeå universitet, 2022. p. 89
Series
Umeå University medical dissertations, ISSN 0346-6612 ; 2184
Keywords
osteoporosis, fracture, alendronate, risedronate, zoledronic acid, glucocorticoid, mortality, osteonecrosis, register, registry, real-world evidence, epidemiology
National Category
Geriatrics Public Health, Global Health and Social Medicine
Research subject
Geriatrics; Epidemiology
Identifiers
urn:nbn:se:umu:diva-194452 (URN)978-91-7855-807-0 (ISBN)978-91-7855-808-7 (ISBN)
Public defence
2022-06-03, Hörsal F, Humanisthuset, Universitetsområdet, Umeå, 13:00 (Swedish)
Opponent
Supervisors
Available from: 2022-05-13 Created: 2022-05-05 Last updated: 2025-02-20Bibliographically approved

Open Access in DiVA

No full text in DiVA

Other links

Publisher's full textPubMedScopus

Authority records

Nordström, PeterBergman, JonathanBallin, MarcelBjörk, SabineNordström, Anna

Search in DiVA

By author/editor
Nordström, PeterBergman, JonathanBallin, MarcelBjörk, SabineNordström, Anna
By organisation
Geriatric MedicineSection of Sustainable Health
In the same journal
Journal of Bone and Mineral Research
Orthopaedics

Search outside of DiVA

GoogleGoogle Scholar

doi
pubmed
urn-nbn

Altmetric score

doi
pubmed
urn-nbn
Total: 398 hits
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf