Umeå University's logo

umu.sePublications
Change search
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf
Housing and Revolution: From the Dom-Kommuna to the Transitional Type of Experimental House (1926-30)
Umeå University, Faculty of Science and Technology, Umeå School of Architecture.
2020 (English)In: Architectural Histories, E-ISSN 2050-5833, Vol. 8, no 1, article id 2Article in journal (Refereed) Published
Abstract [en]

In the USSR, against the backdrop of political change and social instability in the 1920s, the issue of housing for the masses was addressed by the Association of Contemporary Architects (OSA), under the leadership of Moisey Ginzburg. Their mission was not only to provide a solution to the lack of accommodation in the major cities of the country, but to redefine housing as a framework suited to a society transitioning towards a fully socialised life. The response was developed in three stages of design research, over a period of five years. The initial conceptual phase was formally presented by members of the OSA at the 1926 Comradely Competition, and focused on the housing question, with specific designs for communal houses. The second stage revolved around the scientific and methodological research of the Stroykom, developed in parallel with the designs for the new communal living units. The final stage took material form in six specific buildings, known as transitional-type experimental houses. One of these, the Narkomfin, gained worldwide recognition as a modern prototype of Soviet avant-garde housing, and has been widely researched as a result. However, to date no study has approached all three phases with equal scrutiny and methodology. This article offers a detailed account of the OSA's experimental design strategies for collective workers' housing between 1926 and 1930 under Ginzburg's leadership by examining original sources, as well as analysing and restoring the individual projects at each stage. It provides a new interpretation of the famous Narkomfin House and ideas on the first Soviet avant-garde housing project by reconstructing the complex research context in which the building, in tandem with other projects, was developed.

Place, publisher, year, edition, pages
Ubiquity Press, 2020. Vol. 8, no 1, article id 2
National Category
Architectural Engineering
Identifiers
URN: urn:nbn:se:umu:diva-169842DOI: 10.5334/ah.264ISI: 000522830000001Scopus ID: 2-s2.0-85099004885OAI: oai:DiVA.org:umu-169842DiVA, id: diva2:1432265
Available from: 2020-05-26 Created: 2020-05-26 Last updated: 2023-03-23Bibliographically approved

Open Access in DiVA

fulltext(7696 kB)1014 downloads
File information
File name FULLTEXT01.pdfFile size 7696 kBChecksum SHA-512
cd06816570f7d1ce7e91f2c337e79b6a9924fb1b567a26ccd5cf83284287743ef9fd3cb6321e2f9df88dbdaeadf465462ac61e07cfaa52f105087a4c9ae54c15
Type fulltextMimetype application/pdf

Other links

Publisher's full textScopus

Authority records

Movilla Vega, Daniel

Search in DiVA

By author/editor
Movilla Vega, Daniel
By organisation
Umeå School of Architecture
In the same journal
Architectural Histories
Architectural Engineering

Search outside of DiVA

GoogleGoogle Scholar
Total: 1014 downloads
The number of downloads is the sum of all downloads of full texts. It may include eg previous versions that are now no longer available

doi
urn-nbn

Altmetric score

doi
urn-nbn
Total: 1308 hits
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf