Umeå University's logo

umu.sePublications
Change search
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf
Is there a bias in the assessment of teaching skills: a close look at assessment reports
Umeå University, Umeå University Library, Centre for teaching and learning (UPL).ORCID iD: 0000-0002-1000-6057
Umeå University, Faculty of Social Sciences, Umeå School of Business and Economics (USBE), Statistics.
2016 (English)Conference paper, Oral presentation only (Refereed)
Abstract [en]

In recent years local pedagogical qualification models have developed at several Swedish Universities. This trend is also evident in an international perspective (Myers & Myers, 2015; Chalmers, 2011).

Appointment and promotion of academic teachers in Sweden is regulated on national level, but in the pedagogical qualification models local definitions of pedagogical excellence and specific assessment criteria are used. External experts are used regularly in the assessment procedure.

 

At Umea University, the pedagogical qualification model has been running for 3 years and approximately 150 applications have been reviewed by two external experts each. Many of the applications have been from outside the external expert’s own specific subject area. The quality of the assessment reports is generally high, although the conclusions by the experts don’t always agree.

 

Most of the external experts have participated in a course for assessors of pedagogical qualifications (presented at ICED 2014 and ICED 2012). According to the course evaluation the course raised the participants’ ability to assess pedagogical qualifications and gave them functioning assessment methods and models to structure their reports. However, one topic that was not explicitly addressed in the course is the risk of bias in regard to subject area or gender.

 

Based on the assessment reports produced for the pedagogical qualification model at Umea University, I have looked for possible biases in the experts’ conclusions related to subject area or gender of the assessor and applicant. The results will be presented and discussed with the participants in this session.

 

Chalmers, Denise. 2011. Progress and challenges to the recognition and reward of the Scholarship of Teaching in higher education. Higher Education Research & Development, 30:1, pages 25-38.

 

Myers, Carrie B. & Myers, Scott M. 2015. The use of learner-centered assessment practices in the United States: the influence of individual and institutional contexts. Studies in Higher Education 40:10, pages 1904-1918.

Place, publisher, year, edition, pages
2016.
National Category
Educational Sciences
Identifiers
URN: urn:nbn:se:umu:diva-176219OAI: oai:DiVA.org:umu-176219DiVA, id: diva2:1478649
Conference
The International Consortium for Educational Development Conference, 23-25 Nov, 2016, Cape Town, South Africa
Available from: 2020-10-22 Created: 2020-10-22 Last updated: 2020-10-26Bibliographically approved

Open Access in DiVA

No full text in DiVA

Other links

URL

Authority records

Winka, KatarinaSvensson, Ingrid

Search in DiVA

By author/editor
Winka, KatarinaSvensson, Ingrid
By organisation
Centre for teaching and learning (UPL)Statistics
Educational Sciences

Search outside of DiVA

GoogleGoogle Scholar

urn-nbn

Altmetric score

urn-nbn
Total: 633 hits
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf