Umeå University's logo

umu.sePublications
Change search
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf
Popular aesthetics of the 19th century: ornamental prints and pattern sheets as actors for popularization during the 1870s
Umeå University, Faculty of Arts, Department of culture and media studies.ORCID iD: 0000-0002-1380-7378
2020 (English)In: Genealogy of popular science: from ancient ecphrasis to virtual reality / [ed] Jesús Muñoz Morcillo; Caroline Y. Robertson-von Trotha, Bielefeld: Transcript Verlag, 2020, p. 407-424Chapter in book (Refereed)
Abstract [en]

This article seeks to investigate a branch of popular science that emerged during the second half of the 19th century: popular aesthetics. The primary format for popular aesthetics was the illustrated journal, and especially journals engaging in contemporary manufacturing and handicraft. Ornamental prints and pattern sheets functioned as core actors for the popularization of aesthetic knowledge within these kinds of publications. They also function as core actors for the investigation undertaken in this article.

Popular aesthetics had its roots in German aesthetic philosophy from the turn of the 19th century onward. It aimed for an engagement with aesthetic notions — and even aesthetic practice — in daily life. It thereby differs from other forms of popularization of the period that mainly aimed at conveying a text-based education. Popular aesthetics was, via mediation through internationally circulating illustrated journals, a movement that had implications far outside the borders of Germany. In this article, two ways of approaching popular aesthetics in Sweden are presented: one from a design and engineering journal, and the other from a women's journal. The approach of the women's journal is shown to be the more successful of the two, and to have implications for the sloyd movement well into the 21st century.

Place, publisher, year, edition, pages
Bielefeld: Transcript Verlag, 2020. p. 407-424
Series
History of science and technology ; 1
Keywords [en]
Science Communication, Antiquity and Middle Ages, Renaissance and Enlightenment, Modern Visual Culture, Aesthetics and Science Popularization, Science, Art, Cultural History, History of Science, Sociology of Science, Art History, History
National Category
Arts
Identifiers
URN: urn:nbn:se:umu:diva-176920DOI: 10.14361/9783839448359-019Scopus ID: 2-s2.0-105004963140ISBN: 9783837648355 (print)ISBN: 9783839448359 (electronic)OAI: oai:DiVA.org:umu-176920DiVA, id: diva2:1502308
Available from: 2020-11-19 Created: 2020-11-19 Last updated: 2025-05-26Bibliographically approved

Open Access in DiVA

No full text in DiVA

Other links

Publisher's full textScopusPublisher's full text (UmU-access)

Authority records

Manker, Elin

Search in DiVA

By author/editor
Manker, Elin
By organisation
Department of culture and media studies
Arts

Search outside of DiVA

GoogleGoogle Scholar

doi
isbn
urn-nbn

Altmetric score

doi
isbn
urn-nbn
Total: 265 hits
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf