Umeå University's logo

umu.sePublications
Change search
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf
Diagnosing colorectal cancer in primary care: cohort study in Sweden of qualitative faecal immunochemical tests, haemoglobin levels, and platelet counts
Umeå University, Faculty of Medicine, Department of Public Health and Clinical Medicine, Family Medicine.ORCID iD: 0000-0001-8846-7681
Umeå University, Faculty of Medicine, Department of Surgical and Perioperative Sciences, Surgery. (Clister)ORCID iD: 0000-0002-3806-2114
University Health Care Research Centre, Örebro University, Örebro..
Department of Clinical Sciences, Lund University, Malmö; professor of primary care, Department of Medicine and Optometry, Linnaeus University, Kalmar.
Show others and affiliations
2020 (English)In: British Journal of General Practice, ISSN 0960-1643, E-ISSN 1478-5242, Vol. 70, no 701, p. e843-e851Article in journal (Refereed) Published
Abstract [en]

Background: Colorectal cancer (CRC) diagnostics are challenging in primary care and reliable diagnostic aids are desired. Qualitative faecal immunochemical tests (FITs) have been used for suspected CRC in Sweden since the mid-2000s, but evidence regarding their effectiveness is scarce. Anaemia and thrombocytosis are both associated with CRC.

Aim: To evaluate the usefulness of qualitative FITs requested for symptomatic patients in primary care, alone and combined with findings of anaemia and thrombocytosis, in the diagnosis of CRC.

Design and setting: A population-based cohort study using electronic health records and data from the Swedish Cancer Register, covering five Swedish regions.

Method: Patients aged ≥18 years in the five regions who had provided FITs requested by primary care practitioners from 1 January 2015 to 31 December 2015 were identified. FIT and blood-count data were registered and all CRC diagnoses made within 2 years were retrieved. Diagnostic measurements were calculated.

Results: In total, 15 789 patients provided FITs (four different brands); of these patients, 304 were later diagnosed with CRC. Haemoglobin levels were available for 13 863 patients, and platelet counts for 10 973 patients. Calculated for the different FIT brands only, the sensitivities for CRC were 81.6%–100%; specificities 65.7%–79.5%; positive predictive values 4.7%–8.1%; and negative predictive values 99.5%–100%. Calculated for the finding of either a positive FIT or anaemia, the sensitivities increased to 88.9–100%. Adding thrombocytosis did not further increase the diagnostic performance.

Conclusion: Qualitative FITs requested in primary care seem to be useful as rule-in tests for referral when CRC is suspected. A negative FIT and no anaemia indicate a low risk of CRC.

Place, publisher, year, edition, pages
London: Royal College of General Practitioners , 2020. Vol. 70, no 701, p. e843-e851
Keywords [en]
anaemia, colorectal neoplasms, general practice, occult blood, thrombocytosis
National Category
Cancer and Oncology
Identifiers
URN: urn:nbn:se:umu:diva-177340DOI: 10.3399/bjgp20X713465ISI: 000594101500001PubMedID: 33139332Scopus ID: 2-s2.0-85096946830OAI: oai:DiVA.org:umu-177340DiVA, id: diva2:1507179
Funder
Cancerforskningsfonden i Norrland, LP17-2168
Note

This study was supported by unrestricted grants from Region Jämtland Härjedalen (reference numbers: JLL-758141 and JLL-865141), Region Kronoberg (2019-04-19:2), the Cancer Research Foundation in Northern Sweden (LP17-2168), and Jämtland’s Cancer and Nursing Foundation (146/2018 and 2131/2017).

Available from: 2020-12-07 Created: 2020-12-07 Last updated: 2023-03-24Bibliographically approved

Open Access in DiVA

fulltext(129 kB)248 downloads
File information
File name FULLTEXT01.pdfFile size 129 kBChecksum SHA-512
328e7918277ce3ab4794b622f9d3a030e903e82b381d02cc4e04d7a20cf5b2a1b7c4863e02e2ced659f72bd5c9662cacf680f571ef88dbb518516a2b0f063a51
Type fulltextMimetype application/pdf

Other links

Publisher's full textPubMedScopus

Authority records

Högberg, CeciliaGunnarsson, UlfLilja, Mikael

Search in DiVA

By author/editor
Högberg, CeciliaGunnarsson, UlfLilja, Mikael
By organisation
Family MedicineSurgery
In the same journal
British Journal of General Practice
Cancer and Oncology

Search outside of DiVA

GoogleGoogle Scholar
Total: 248 downloads
The number of downloads is the sum of all downloads of full texts. It may include eg previous versions that are now no longer available

doi
pubmed
urn-nbn

Altmetric score

doi
pubmed
urn-nbn
Total: 330 hits
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf