Umeå University's logo

umu.sePublications
Change search
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf
Variability in patient characteristics and service provision of interdisciplinary pain rehabilitation: a study using the Swedish national quality registry for pain rehabilitation
Umeå University, Faculty of Medicine, Department of Community Medicine and Rehabilitation, Rehabilitation Medicine. Karolinska Institutet, Department of Clinical Sciences, Division of Rehabilitation Medicine, Danderyd Hospital, Stockholm, Sweden.
Show others and affiliations
2020 (English)In: Journal of Rehabilitation Medicine, ISSN 1650-1977, E-ISSN 1651-2081, Vol. 52, no 11, article id jrm00128Article in journal (Refereed) Published
Abstract [en]

Objective: To describe the organization, content and dosage of interdisciplinary pain rehabilitation, and the differences in degree of severity of problems of patients admitted to clinical units reporting to a Swedish national quality pain registry, grouped according to unit size and possible affiliation with a university hospital.

Methods: Reports from 31 out of 39 clinical units in Sweden, on inclusion processes, organization, content and dosage of interdisciplinary pain rehabilitation, and patient-reported data from a Swedish national quality pain registry at assessment for interdisciplinary pain rehabilitation were analysed.

Results: the number of patients treated annually at each unit ranged from 3 to 340. In 17 units, teams comprised 5 professionals. Dosage of interdisciplinary pain rehabilitation ranged from 20-180 h per patient in total. Patients at the university-hospital units scored the highest levels of symptoms and lowest levels of health related quality of life. Units used similar sets of inclusion criteria, and several treatments, such as education, self-training and psychological interventions, were used by most units.

Conclusion: When interpreting outcome data from registries, aspects other than rehabilitation out-comes must be considered. The interpretation of outcomes from quality registries would be facilitated if data, in addition to assessments and patient reported outcomes, also includes standardized descriptions of the reporting clinical units.

Place, publisher, year, edition, pages
Foundation for Rehabilitation Information , 2020. Vol. 52, no 11, article id jrm00128
Keywords [en]
chronic pain, multimodal rehabilitation, pain registry, treatment dosage, treatment duration, inclusion criteria, team composition, rehabilitation organization
National Category
Other Medical Sciences not elsewhere specified
Identifiers
URN: urn:nbn:se:umu:diva-178395DOI: 10.2340/16501977-2765ISI: 000600445200008PubMedID: 33191437Scopus ID: 2-s2.0-85098865596OAI: oai:DiVA.org:umu-178395DiVA, id: diva2:1516255
Available from: 2021-01-11 Created: 2021-01-11 Last updated: 2023-03-24Bibliographically approved

Open Access in DiVA

No full text in DiVA

Other links

Publisher's full textPubMedScopus

Authority records

Stålnacke, Britt-Marie

Search in DiVA

By author/editor
Stålnacke, Britt-Marie
By organisation
Rehabilitation Medicine
In the same journal
Journal of Rehabilitation Medicine
Other Medical Sciences not elsewhere specified

Search outside of DiVA

GoogleGoogle Scholar

doi
pubmed
urn-nbn

Altmetric score

doi
pubmed
urn-nbn
Total: 320 hits
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf