Umeå University's logo

umu.sePublications
Change search
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf
Gud, metafysik och ontoteologi
Lunds universitet, Lund, Sverige.
2020 (Swedish)In: Svensk teologisk kvartalskrift, ISSN 0039-6761, Vol. 96, no 2, p. 159-171Article in journal (Refereed) Published
Abstract [en]

This article analyzes the use of metaphysics to speak of God within theology. More specifically, the charge of ontotheology levelled against Thomas Aquinas, in particular by Jean-Luc Marion and John Caputo, are being analyzed and criticized, not only with the help of thinkers like John Knasas and W. Norris Clarke, but also Marion himself. Because this article also examines the change of heart that Marion had about Aquinas's metaphysics during the 1990s, his position now being that Aquinas was not a producer of ontotheology. However, the article also asks a specific question of whether there can be a metaphysics that safeguards an objective standard for our knowledge and assertions, but that does not reduce the divine mystery to the categories of human reason, something that ontotheology allegedly does. With this question in mind, I examine Erich Przywara's version of the doctrine of the analogy of being, that he derived from Aquinas, and which he developed, at least in part, to answer Karl Barth's criticism against this doctrine. I look specifically at his idea of essence in-and-beyond existence, which describes a dynamic in our ontological constitution that Przywara sees as fundamental for all contingent existence. Other parts of his doctrine that are mentioned are the difference between "philosophical metaphysics" and "theological metaphysics" and the idea of the principle of non-contradiction as "negative reductive formality". My conclusion is that although Przywara's doctrine avoids the charge of ontotheology, it does not suffice as a metaphysic that offers an objective standard.

Place, publisher, year, edition, pages
Lunds universitet , 2020. Vol. 96, no 2, p. 159-171
Keywords [sv]
Thomas av Aquino, analogi, Martin Heidegger, Jean-Luc Marion, John Caputo, ontoteologi, Erich Przywara, religionsfilosofi, thomism, Duns Scotus, univocitet
National Category
Philosophy Religious Studies
Research subject
Philosophy of Religion
Identifiers
URN: urn:nbn:se:umu:diva-174680OAI: oai:DiVA.org:umu-174680DiVA, id: diva2:1523305
Available from: 2021-01-28 Created: 2021-01-28 Last updated: 2024-07-02Bibliographically approved

Open Access in DiVA

fulltext(141 kB)6 downloads
File information
File name FULLTEXT01.pdfFile size 141 kBChecksum SHA-512
095bfcb7d074ab31fd7424fa56bb719a14fe8a6ed1c6941a5265c296afdb30aa4acc62864250b95b9c4f69066a66cb245fd15f95ffdfacfa21dc16e31579ca6c
Type fulltextMimetype application/pdf

Other links

Förlagets fulltext

Authority records

Astudillo, Jacob

Search in DiVA

By author/editor
Astudillo, Jacob
In the same journal
Svensk teologisk kvartalskrift
PhilosophyReligious Studies

Search outside of DiVA

GoogleGoogle Scholar
Total: 6 downloads
The number of downloads is the sum of all downloads of full texts. It may include eg previous versions that are now no longer available

urn-nbn

Altmetric score

urn-nbn
Total: 337 hits
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf