Umeå University's logo

Objective: To evaluate patient-reported outcome measures in 2 different multimodal pain rehabilitation programmes and to determine whether outcomes are related to sex or age at 1-year follow-up.

Design: Longitudinal retrospective study.

Subjects: Patients who had participated in 1 of 2 multimodal pain rehabilitation programmes at 2 rehabilitation centres. A total of 356 women and 83 men, divided into 3 age groups.

Methods: Data from the Swedish Quality Registry for Pain Rehabilitation regarding activity and physical functions, pain intensity, health status and emotional functions analysed with descriptive statistics.

Results: Significant improvements in activity and physical functions, pain intensity and emotional functions were found in both multimodal pain rehabilitation programmes. Women improved more than men. The older group improved in all emotional functions (depression, anxiety, mental component summary), while the younger group improved only in depression. The intermediate group improved in all variables except anxiety.

Conclusion: Patients improved regardless of the design of the multimodal pain rehabilitation programme. Although only small differences were found between men and women and among the 3 age groups in terms of the measured variables, these findings may have clinical relevance and indicate a need to vary the design of the interventions in multimodal rehabilitation programmes for these subgroups.

Background: Chronic pain is a major and complex health condition associated with reduced work performance. A multimodal rehabilitation programme (MMRP) is a common intervention for chronic pain conditions, the goal being for the person to maintain or return to work. Aim: To investigate the multivariate relationships between health-related quality of life, life interference, pain, physiological factors before MMRP and full-time sick leave 1 year after MMRP.

Material and Methods: Data were collected from the Swedish Quality Registry for Pain Rehabilitation. The study included 284 participants. Separate analyses were performed for women, men and three age groups.

Results: There were correlations between sick leave, physical functioning, pain duration, health-related quality of life, and self-assessed importance of work before MMRP and sick leave 1 year after MMRP. The patterns of factors associated with full-time sick leave varied for women, men and age groups.

Conclusions: These findings indicate that full-time sick leave for patients with chronic pain is affected by a number of interacting factors. Occupational therapy interventions aiming to develop activity skills in relation to work roles and enable patients to develop skills required to manage the physical, psychological and social demands to return to work or maintain work could be valuable to increase the possibility of attaining a sustainable work situation.

Background: Patients with chronic pain who live in rural areas often need to travel long distances to participate in multimodal rehabilitation programs. To reduce traveling during the programs, patients sometimes live at a residency close to the clinic and thus far from home.

Aims: The aim of this study was to explore how patients with chronic pain experience participation in an multimodal rehabilitation program while living at a residency.

Method: Twelve patients from two specialist clinics in northern Sweden were interviewed about their experiences of participating in a multimodal rehabilitation program. The data were analyzed qualitatively using a grounded theory method with an emergent design.

Results: The analyses resulted in a model with the core category “finding my self-worth” consisting of four categories: “space for myself,” “mirroring myself,” “I am of value,” and “dealing with returning to everyday life.” The model illustrates the process whereby participants are given space for themselves and an opportunity to mirror themselves in interaction with other participants. That provided insight about their self-worth that was valuable for return to everyday life at home and work.

Conclusion: Living at a residency during multimodal rehabilitation provided added value when patients were relived from the obligations of everyday life at home and given time for reflection and interaction with others in similar situations. This contributed to awareness of their own value and the necessity of taking care of themselves. This new insight led to increased motivation to act differently at home.

Contexte: Les patients souffrant de douleur chronique qui vivent en milieu rural doivent souvent parcourir de longues distances pour participer à des programmes de réhabilitation multimodale. Pour réduire les déplacements pendant les programmes, les patients vivent parfois dans une résidence à proximité de la clinique et donc loin de chez eux.

Objectifs: Le but de cette étude était de se pencher sur la façon dont les patients souffrant de douleur chronique vivent leur participation à un programme de réadaptation multimodale lors-qu’ils vivent en résidence.

Méthode: Douze patients provenant de deux cliniques spécialisées du Nord de la Suède ont été interviewés sur leur participation à un programme de réadaptation multimodale. Les données ont été analysées de manière qualitative en utilisant la méthode de la théorie ancrée et un devis émergent.

Résultats: Les analyses ont donné lieu à un modèle dont la catégorie principale, « trouver ma valeur personnelle », consiste en quatre catégories : « un espace pour moi », « mon reflet », « j’ai de la valeur » et « le retour à la vie de tous les jours ». Ce modèle illustre le processus par lequel les participants disposent d’un espace pour eux-mêmes et ont l’occasion de voir leur propre reflet, en interaction avec les autres participants. Cela leur a permis de mieux percevoir leur propre valeur personnelle, ce qui a été d’une grande utilité pour leur retour à la vie quotidienne à la maison et au travail.

Conclusion: Le fait de vivre en résidence pendant une réadaptation multimodale a apporté une valeur ajoutée lorsque les patients ont été libérés des obligations de la vie quotidienne à la maison et ont eu le temps de réfléchir et d’interagir avec d’autres personnes dans des situations similaires. Cela a contribué à la prise de conscience de leur propre valeur et de la nécessité de prendre soin d’eux-mêmes. Cette nouvelle perspective a conduit à une motivation accrue pour agir différemment à la maison.