Umeå University's logo

umu.sePublications
Change search
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf
Influence Without Metrics: Analyzing the Impact of Far-Right Users in an Online Discussion Forum
Umeå University, Faculty of Social Sciences, Department of Sociology. Centre for Digital Social Research (DIGSUM).ORCID iD: 0000-0001-5028-0408
2021 (English)In: Social Media + Society, E-ISSN 2056-3051, Vol. 7, no 2, article id 20563051211008831Article in journal (Refereed) Published
Abstract [en]

The study presented in this article explores the processes through which influence takes shape in eclectic online forums with few vanity metrics. Using a dataset of 7.5 million posts in the large Swedish online discussion forum Flashback, it explores who becomes influential, their strategies for appealing to the community, and others’ support of them. While it has been known that Flashback hosts far-right users and content, the current study shows that these sentiments are not fringe or obscure, but instead seemingly widely supported and influential in the forum. It illustrates that the influential users - those who are supported and acknowledged by others as important - exclusively and continuously expressed far-right ideas and displayed an embeddedness within the far-right, as well as in the forum’s culture. The study finds that despite few visible markers, many users learned to recognize influential users and their far-right content as worthy of support. In the absence of built-in functions, some users engaged in manual “liking” and “sharing” of influential users’ content via their replies, acknowledging it as a way to legitimize them. At the same time, the analysis showcased how a lack of vanity metrics countered potential echo chamber effects in the forum as disliked users - advocating progressive gender and immigration ideas - were unintentionally amplified by those who attempted to silence them. The article also discusses the role of Flashback as a platform in the proliferation of hate.

Place, publisher, year, edition, pages
Sage Publications, 2021. Vol. 7, no 2, article id 20563051211008831
Keywords [en]
anonymity, far-right discourse, influence, influential users, online discussion forums, radical right, vanity metrics
National Category
Computer Sciences
Identifiers
URN: urn:nbn:se:umu:diva-183004DOI: 10.1177/20563051211008831ISI: 000639959500001Scopus ID: 2-s2.0-85104232883OAI: oai:DiVA.org:umu-183004DiVA, id: diva2:1555217
Funder
Swedish Research Council, 2016-02971Available from: 2021-05-18 Created: 2021-05-18 Last updated: 2022-02-10Bibliographically approved
In thesis
1. Far right, right here: interconnections of discourse, platforms, and users in the digital mainstream
Open this publication in new window or tab >>Far right, right here: interconnections of discourse, platforms, and users in the digital mainstream
2022 (English)Doctoral thesis, comprehensive summary (Other academic)
Alternative title[sv]
Radikalhögern online : en analys av diskurs, plattformar och inflytelserika användare i ett digitalt mainstream
Abstract [en]

Background: This thesis explores the far right online beyond the study of political parties and extremist far-right sites and content. Specifically, it focuses on the proliferation of far-right discourse among ‘ordinary’ internet users in mainstream digital settings. In doing so, it aims to bring the study of far-right discourse and the enabling roles of digital platforms and influential users into dialogue. It does so by analysing what is communicated and how; where it is communicated and therein the roles of different socio-technical features associated with various online settings; and finally, by whom, focusing on particularly influential users.

Methods: The thesis uses material from four different datasets of digital, user-generated content, collected at different times through different methods. These datasets have been analysed using mixedmethods approaches wherein interpretative methods, primarily in the form of critical discourse analysis (CDA), have been combined with various data processing techniques, descriptive statistics, visualisations, and computational data analysis methods.

Results: The thesis provides a number of findings in relation to farright discourse, digital platforms, and online influence, respectively. In doing so it builds on the findings of previous research, illustrates unexpected and contradictory results in relation to what was previously known, and makes a number of interesting new discoveries. Overall, it begins to unravel the complex interconnectedness of far-right discourse, platforms, and influential users, and illustrates that to understand the far-right’s efforts online it is imperative to take several dimensions into account simultaneously.

Conclusion: The thesis makes several contributions. First, the thesis makes a conceptual contribution by focusing on the interconnectedness of far-right efforts online. Second, it makes an empirical contribution by exploring the multifaceted grassroots or ‘non-party’ dimensions of farright mobilisation, Finally, the thesis makes a methodological contribution through its mix of methods which illustrates how different aspects of the far right, over varying time periods, diversely sized and shaped datasets, and user constellations, can be approached to reveal broader overarching patterns as well as intricate details.

Place, publisher, year, edition, pages
Umeå: Umeå Universitet, 2022. p. 90
Series
Akademiska avhandlingar vid Sociologiska institutionen, Umeå universitet, ISSN 1104-2508 ; D122
Keywords
far-right discourse, radical right, Sweden, internet, social media, online platforms, user-generated content, influential users, mixed methods, critical discourse analysis, CDA, radikalhögerdiskurser, radiklhögern, Sverige, internet, sociala medier, digitala plattformar, användar-genererat innehåll, inflytande, kombinerade metoder, kritisk diskursanalys, CDA
National Category
Sociology
Research subject
Sociology
Identifiers
urn:nbn:se:umu:diva-191942 (URN)978-91-7855-724-0 (ISBN)978-91-7855-725-7 (ISBN)
Public defence
2022-03-03, Aula Biologica, Biologihuset, Umeå, 13:15 (English)
Opponent
Supervisors
Available from: 2022-02-10 Created: 2022-01-27 Last updated: 2022-01-28Bibliographically approved

Open Access in DiVA

fulltext(1354 kB)557 downloads
File information
File name FULLTEXT02.pdfFile size 1354 kBChecksum SHA-512
0b14065a8b698ab84ba42649c114c1394a6217b6ab45a35e5819e1b75c2c691eba91fa764ba1de23a0f1ec8d59d381aeb5c6b9ef46a4b3ad41a4913c1ae2d6d0
Type fulltextMimetype application/pdf

Other links

Publisher's full textScopus

Authority records

Åkerlund, Mathilda

Search in DiVA

By author/editor
Åkerlund, Mathilda
By organisation
Department of Sociology
In the same journal
Social Media + Society
Computer Sciences

Search outside of DiVA

GoogleGoogle Scholar
Total: 572 downloads
The number of downloads is the sum of all downloads of full texts. It may include eg previous versions that are now no longer available

doi
urn-nbn

Altmetric score

doi
urn-nbn
Total: 780 hits
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf