Umeå University's logo

umu.sePublications
Change search
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf
Analysis Choices Impact Movement Evaluation: A Multi-Aspect Inferential Method Applied to Kinematic Curves of Vertical Hops in Knee-Injured and Asymptomatic Persons
Umeå University, Faculty of Science and Technology, Department of Mathematics and Mathematical Statistics.ORCID iD: 0000-0003-1098-0076
Department of Statistical Sciences, Università Cattolica del Sacro Cuore, Milan, Italy.
Umeå University, Faculty of Medicine, Department of Community Medicine and Rehabilitation, Section of Physiotherapy.ORCID iD: 0000-0002-0366-4609
Umeå University, Faculty of Social Sciences, Umeå School of Business and Economics (USBE), Statistics.ORCID iD: 0000-0001-7917-5687
2021 (English)In: Frontiers in Bioengineering and Biotechnology, E-ISSN 2296-4185, Vol. 9, article id 645014Article in journal (Refereed) Published
Abstract [en]

Three-dimensional human motion analysis provides in-depth understanding in order to optimize sports performance or rehabilitation following disease or injury. Recent developments of statistical methods for functional data allow for novel ways to analyze often complex biomechanical data. Even so, for such methods as well as for traditional well-established statistical methods, the interpretations of the results may be influenced by analysis choices made prior to the analysis. We evaluated the consequences of three such choices when comparing one-leg vertical hop (OLVH) performance in individuals who had ruptured their anterior cruciate ligament (ACL), to that of asymptomatic controls, and also athletes. Kinematic data were analyzed using a statistical approach for functional data, targeting entire curve data. This was done not only for one joint at a time but also for multiple lower limb joints and movement planes simultaneously using a multi-aspect methodology, testing for group differences while also accounting for covariates. We present the results of when an individual representative curve out of three available was either: (1) a mean curve (Mean), (2) a curve from the highest hop (Max), or (3) a curve describing the variability (Var), as a representation of performance stability. We also evaluated choice of sample leg comparison; e.g., ACL-injured leg compared to either the dominant or non-dominant leg of asymptomatic groups. Finally, we explored potential outcome effects of different combinations of included joints. There were slightly more pronounced group differences when using Mean compared to Max, while the specifics of the observed differences depended on the outcome variable. For Var there were less significant group differences. Generally, there were more disparities throughout the hop movement when comparing the injured leg to the dominant leg of controls, resulting in e.g., group differences for trunk and ankle kinematics, for both Mean and Max. When the injured leg was instead compared to the non-dominant leg of controls, there were trunk, hip and knee joint differences. For a more stringent comparison, we suggest considering to compare the injured leg to the non-dominant leg. Finally, the multiple-joint analyses were coherent with the single-joint analyses. The direct effects of analysis choices can be explored interactively by the reader in the Supplementary Material. To summarize, the choices definitively have an impact on the interpretation of a hop test results commonly used in rehabilitation following knee injuries. We therefore strongly recommend well-documented methodological analysis choices with regards to comparisons and representative values of the measures of interests.

Place, publisher, year, edition, pages
Frontiers Media S.A., 2021. Vol. 9, article id 645014
Keywords [en]
anterior cruciate ligament injury, biomechanics, functional data analysis, interval-wise testing, knee rehabilitation, leg comparisons, movement control
National Category
Sport and Fitness Sciences Physiotherapy
Identifiers
URN: urn:nbn:se:umu:diva-184048DOI: 10.3389/fbioe.2021.645014ISI: 000655507900001PubMedID: 34055756Scopus ID: 2-s2.0-85107025270OAI: oai:DiVA.org:umu-184048DiVA, id: diva2:1563110
Available from: 2021-06-09 Created: 2021-06-09 Last updated: 2023-03-24Bibliographically approved

Open Access in DiVA

fulltext(4535 kB)105 downloads
File information
File name FULLTEXT01.pdfFile size 4535 kBChecksum SHA-512
3fd7a18e17e8ada8882a547c2e4821b73c490bd2fa941fa2ad9587f0898554aa65b941b40cf2c31c9e79f7402c41c767a5a70e9af59c424f527c03167ab5403c
Type fulltextMimetype application/pdf

Other links

Publisher's full textPubMedScopus

Authority records

Strandberg, JohanHäger, CharlotteSchelin, Lina

Search in DiVA

By author/editor
Strandberg, JohanHäger, CharlotteSchelin, Lina
By organisation
Department of Mathematics and Mathematical StatisticsSection of PhysiotherapyStatistics
In the same journal
Frontiers in Bioengineering and Biotechnology
Sport and Fitness SciencesPhysiotherapy

Search outside of DiVA

GoogleGoogle Scholar
Total: 105 downloads
The number of downloads is the sum of all downloads of full texts. It may include eg previous versions that are now no longer available

doi
pubmed
urn-nbn

Altmetric score

doi
pubmed
urn-nbn
Total: 216 hits
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf