Umeå University's logo

umu.sePublications
Change search
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf
Global variation in anastomosis and end colostomy formation following left-sided colorectal resection
Sundsvall Hospital, Sweden.ORCID iD: 0000-0001-6897-2058
2019 (English)In: BJS Open, E-ISSN 2474-9842, Vol. 3, no 3, p. 403-414Article in journal (Refereed) Published
Abstract [en]

Background: End colostomy rates following colorectal resection vary across institutions in high-income settings, being influenced by patient, disease, surgeon and system factors. This study aimed to assess global variation in end colostomy rates after left-sided colorectal resection.

Methods: This study comprised an analysis of GlobalSurg-1 and -2 international, prospective, observational cohort studies (2014, 2016), including consecutive adult patients undergoing elective or emergency left-sided colorectal resection within discrete 2-week windows. Countries were grouped into high-, middle- and low-income tertiles according to the United Nations Human Development Index (HDI). Factors associated with colostomy formation versus primary anastomosis were explored using a multilevel, multivariable logistic regression model.

Results: In total, 1635 patients from 242 hospitals in 57 countries undergoing left-sided colorectal resection were included: 113 (6·9 per cent) from low-HDI, 254 (15·5 per cent) from middle-HDI and 1268 (77·6 per cent) from high-HDI countries. There was a higher proportion of patients with perforated disease (57·5, 40·9 and 35·4 per cent; P < 0·001) and subsequent use of end colostomy (52·2, 24·8 and 18·9 per cent; P < 0·001) in low- compared with middle- and high-HDI settings. The association with colostomy use in low-HDI settings persisted (odds ratio (OR) 3·20, 95 per cent c.i. 1·35 to 7·57; P = 0·008) after risk adjustment for malignant disease (OR 2·34, 1·65 to 3·32; P < 0·001), emergency surgery (OR 4·08, 2·73 to 6·10; P < 0·001), time to operation at least 48 h (OR 1·99, 1·28 to 3·09; P = 0·002) and disease perforation (OR 4·00, 2·81 to 5·69; P < 0·001).

Conclusion: Global differences existed in the proportion of patients receiving end stomas after left-sided colorectal resection based on income, which went beyond case mix alone.

Place, publisher, year, edition, pages
Oxford University Press, 2019. Vol. 3, no 3, p. 403-414
National Category
Surgery
Identifiers
URN: urn:nbn:se:umu:diva-184272DOI: 10.1002/bjs5.50138ISI: 000473810300019PubMedID: 31891112Scopus ID: 2-s2.0-85078321341OAI: oai:DiVA.org:umu-184272DiVA, id: diva2:1564081
Note

Members of the GlobalSurg Collaborative are collaborators in this study and are listed in Appendix S1 (supporting information)

Available from: 2021-06-11 Created: 2021-06-11 Last updated: 2022-02-10Bibliographically approved

Open Access in DiVA

fulltext(576 kB)113 downloads
File information
File name FULLTEXT01.pdfFile size 576 kBChecksum SHA-512
d8501372432462c17752fc2c8d6978dd63ef66d55299441fa36acdb7bf4aa870e0bdb3f2d68ed264ed098e7dc52004874c2adb196070ebb028aba64f44ee2287
Type fulltextMimetype application/pdf

Other links

Publisher's full textPubMedScopus

Authority records

Cengiz, Yucel

Search in DiVA

By author/editor
Cengiz, Yucel
In the same journal
BJS Open
Surgery

Search outside of DiVA

GoogleGoogle Scholar
Total: 114 downloads
The number of downloads is the sum of all downloads of full texts. It may include eg previous versions that are now no longer available

doi
pubmed
urn-nbn

Altmetric score

doi
pubmed
urn-nbn
Total: 333 hits
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf