Umeå University's logo

Limestone is a raw material in the cement and quicklime industry and knowledge about limestone characteristics can help improve and optimize production processes. In the end this can lead to a reduction in CO2 emissions from the industry.

In this project X-ray tomography (XRT) was used to examine limestone samples. The aim was to determine if XRT, including synchrotron-based XRT, is a reliablemethod to determine porosity, pore structure and internal distributions of pores and pyrite (FeS2) grains in limestone. The aim also included to determine if XRT could be used to resolve material variations, fine-grained and larger crystals in limestone. In total, there were ten limestone samples and the performed XRT was done by Advanced Light Source (ALS) in Berkeley, California and by Luleå University of Technology. A brief comparison between ALS and Luleå was also done by inspectingsamples that have been through XRT at both facilities. The main software used foranalysis was Avizo v.9.2.0.

The results showed that XRT is a suitable method for determining porosity and pore distribution. Interactive thresholding was used in Avizo for measuring porosity. The porosity was determined as a single value and as a narrow range, where a narrow range was more reliable. XRT was also found to be a suitable method for visually determining a variety of textures within the samples. Areas with different materials(such as dolomite) and/or newly-formed crystals were visually distinguishable but individual newly-formed crystals were not as clear when compared to scanning electron microscopy. Individual older fine-grained and larger crystals were hard to resolve.

Internal distributions in 3D of both pores and pyrite grains were possible to obtain with XRT. The analysis of internal distributions was found to be a clear advantage with the method of XRT. The equivalent diameter of pores and pyrite grains was also measured and plotted in histograms. The XRT performed at ALS had higher resolution than the XRT performed in Luleå (0.65 vs 2 μm). Lower resolution over-estimated the average equivalent diameter of pores, and boundaries of pores and cavities were harder to see. Therefore, the higher resolution from ALS was preferable. These results contribute to understanding limestone characteristics.