Umeå University's logo

umu.sePublications
Operational message
There are currently operational disruptions. Troubleshooting is in progress.
Change search
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf
Outcome after resection for invasive intraductal papillary mucinous neoplasia is similar to conventional pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma
Show others and affiliations
2021 (English)In: Pancreatology, ISSN 1424-3903, E-ISSN 1424-3911, Vol. 21, no 7, p. 1371-1377Article in journal (Refereed) Published
Abstract [en]

Background/objectives: Resections for intraductal papillary mucinous neoplasm (IPMN) have increased last decades. Overall survival (OS) for conventional pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC) is well known but OS for invasive IPMN (inv-IPMN) is not as conclusive. This study aims to elucidate potential differences in clinicopathology and OS between these tumor types and to investigate if the raised number of resections have affected outcome.

Methods: Consecutive patients ≥18 years of age resected for inv-IPMN and PDAC at Karolinska University Hospital between 2009 and 2018 were included. Clinicopathological variables were analyzed in multivariable regression models. Outcome was assessed calculating two-year OS, estimating OS using the Kaplan-Meier model and comparing survival functions with log-rank test.

Results: 513 patients were included, 122 with inv-IPMN and 391 with PDAC. During the study period both the proportion resected inv-IPMN and two-year OS, irrespective of tumor type, increased (2.5%–45%; p < 0.001 and 44%–57%; p = 0.005 respectively). In Kaplan-Meier survival analysis inv-IPMN had more favorable median OS (mOS) compared to PDAC (33.6 months vs 19.3 months, p = 0.001). However, in multivariable Cox Regression analysis, tumor type was not a predictor for death, but so were resection period, tumor subtype and N-stage (all p < 0.001).

Conclusion: In this large single center observational cohort study, inv-IPMN seemed to have favorable survival outcome compared to PDAC, but after adjusting for predictors for death this benefit vanished. The combination of a pronounced increase in resected inv-IPMN and a concurrent hazard abatement for death within 2 years during the study period proved to be a principal factor.

Place, publisher, year, edition, pages
Elsevier, 2021. Vol. 21, no 7, p. 1371-1377
Keywords [en]
Intraductal papillary mucinous neoplasm, Invasive, Pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma, Survival
National Category
Surgery Gastroenterology and Hepatology
Identifiers
URN: urn:nbn:se:umu:diva-187092DOI: 10.1016/j.pan.2021.07.009ISI: 000729823500018PubMedID: 34426077Scopus ID: 2-s2.0-85113340984OAI: oai:DiVA.org:umu-187092DiVA, id: diva2:1590380
Available from: 2021-09-02 Created: 2021-09-02 Last updated: 2025-10-02Bibliographically approved

Open Access in DiVA

fulltext(787 kB)243 downloads
File information
File name FULLTEXT02.pdfFile size 787 kBChecksum SHA-512
a3dcb1906a901809391e7d8ec0d5e2bd2be2e9574c08b5e41a18d0ee2a6eee868a3fa60352dff176da4c2974e6d4af767782b72642714d14f3a942cb3fc360a0
Type fulltextMimetype application/pdf

Other links

Publisher's full textPubMedScopus

Authority records

Arnelo, Urban

Search in DiVA

By author/editor
Arnelo, Urban
By organisation
Surgery
In the same journal
Pancreatology
SurgeryGastroenterology and Hepatology

Search outside of DiVA

GoogleGoogle Scholar
Total: 284 downloads
The number of downloads is the sum of all downloads of full texts. It may include eg previous versions that are now no longer available

doi
pubmed
urn-nbn

Altmetric score

doi
pubmed
urn-nbn
Total: 349 hits
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf