Umeå University's logo

umu.sePublications
Change search
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf
Responses of multiple structural and functional indicators along three contrasting disturbance gradients
Department of Aquatic Sciences and Assessment, Swedish University of Agricultural Sciences, Uppsala, Sweden.
Umeå University, Faculty of Science and Technology, Department of Ecology and Environmental Sciences.ORCID iD: 0000-0002-5758-2705
Department of Wildlife, Fish, and Environmental Studies, Swedish University of Agricultural Sciences, Umeå, Sweden.
Department of Aquatic Sciences and Assessment, Swedish University of Agricultural Sciences, Uppsala, Sweden; School of Natural Resource, University of Nebraska – Lincoln, NE, Lincoln, United States.
Show others and affiliations
2022 (English)In: Ecological Indicators, ISSN 1470-160X, E-ISSN 1872-7034, Vol. 135, article id 108514Article in journal (Refereed) Published
Abstract [en]

Ecosystem functioning and community structure are recognized as key components of ecosystem integrity, but comprehensive, standardized studies of the responses of both structural and functional indicators to different types of anthropogenic pressures remain rare. Consequently, we lack an empirical basis for (i) identifying when monitoring ecosystem structure alone misses important changes in ecosystem functioning, (ii) recommending sets of structural and functional metrics best suited for detecting ecological change driven by different anthropogenic pressures, and (iii) understanding the cumulative effects of multiple, co-occurring stressors on structure and function. We investigated variation in community structure and ecosystem functioning of stream ecosystems along three gradients (10–16 independent stream sites each) of increasing impact arising from agriculture, forestry and river regulation for hydropower, respectively. For each stream, we quantified variation in (i) the abiotic environment, (ii) community composition of four organism groups and (iii) three basal ecosystem processes underpinning carbon and nutrient cycling in streams. We assessed the responsiveness of multiple biodiversity, community structure and ecosystem functioning indicators based on variance explained and effect size metrics. Along a gradient of increasing agricultural impact, diatoms and fish were the most responsive groups overall, but significant variation was detected in at least one aspect of community composition, abundance and/or biodiversity of every organism group. In contrast, most of our functional metrics did not vary significantly along the agricultural gradient, possibly due to contrasting, antagonistic effects of increasing nutrient concentrations and turbidity on ecosystem process rates. The exception was detritivore-mediated litter decomposition which increased up to moderate levels of nutrient. Impacts of river regulation were most marked for diatoms, which were responsive to both increasingly frequent hydropeaking and to increasing seasonal river regulation. Among functional indicators, both litter decomposition and algal biomass accrual declined significantly with increasing hydropeaking. Few structural or functional metrics varied with forest management, with macroinvertebrate diversity increasing along the forestry gradient, as did algal and fungal biomass accrual. Together, these findings highlight the challenges of making inferences about the impacts of anthropogenic disturbances at the ecosystem level based on community data alone, and pinpoint the need to identify optimal sets of functional and structural indicators best suited for detecting ecological changes associated with different human activities.

Place, publisher, year, edition, pages
Elsevier, 2022. Vol. 135, article id 108514
Keywords [en]
Agriculture, Community structure, Ecosystem functioning, Forestry, Multiple stressors, River regulation
National Category
Ecology
Identifiers
URN: urn:nbn:se:umu:diva-191072DOI: 10.1016/j.ecolind.2021.108514ISI: 000761396600001Scopus ID: 2-s2.0-85121963166OAI: oai:DiVA.org:umu-191072DiVA, id: diva2:1625832
Available from: 2022-01-10 Created: 2022-01-10 Last updated: 2023-09-05Bibliographically approved

Open Access in DiVA

fulltext(3162 kB)208 downloads
File information
File name FULLTEXT01.pdfFile size 3162 kBChecksum SHA-512
147d9d6a050204ca3a22fa789f6f7982f2b8453f0607e491b7969d5170cd82d0d3cf0f687073c5bbf66ba3cf2162867ab204c42c2b73ec06393b578277d7ae67
Type fulltextMimetype application/pdf

Other links

Publisher's full textScopus

Authority records

Sponseller, Ryan A.

Search in DiVA

By author/editor
Sponseller, Ryan A.
By organisation
Department of Ecology and Environmental Sciences
In the same journal
Ecological Indicators
Ecology

Search outside of DiVA

GoogleGoogle Scholar
Total: 208 downloads
The number of downloads is the sum of all downloads of full texts. It may include eg previous versions that are now no longer available

doi
urn-nbn

Altmetric score

doi
urn-nbn
Total: 799 hits
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf