Umeå University's logo

umu.sePublications
Change search
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf
Data Collection Procedures and Injury Definitions in Badminton: A Consensus Statement According to the Delphi Approach
Umeå University, Faculty of Medicine, Department of Clinical Sciences, Professional Development.
Show others and affiliations
2022 (English)In: Clinical Journal of Sports Medicine, ISSN 1050-642X, E-ISSN 1536-3724, Vol. 32, no 5, p. e444-e450Article in journal (Refereed) Published
Abstract [en]

Previous studies involving injury surveillance in badminton players have used nonstandardized injury definitions and data collection methodologies. The purpose of this study was to apply a Delphi method to (1) reach a consensus on an injury definition in badminton and (2) develop a standardized badminton injury report form. An Injury Consensus Group was established under the auspices of the Badminton World Federation, and initial injury definitions and injury report form were developed. An internal panel was formed from the Injury Consensus Group, and an external panel was selected based on a combination of profession, experience in the field, sport-specific knowledge/expertise, and geographical location to obtain a widely representative sample. Through 2 rounds of voting by the external panel, consensus was reached on both the definition of an injury in badminton and a standardized injury report form. The agreed injury definition was “Any physical injury sustained by a player during a match or training regardless if further diagnostic tests were done or if playing time was lost” and the injury report form contained the following 7 sections: Injury record, Diagnosis, Injury mechanism, Regarding pain, Pain and return to play/training after injury, Grade of severity, and Recurrence. We recommend the use of the definitions and methods presented in this consensus statement for the reporting of injury in all international and domestic badminton players. This should make future injury surveillance reports directly comparable and hence more informative in recognizing trends over time and differences between countries.

Place, publisher, year, edition, pages
Wolters Kluwer, 2022. Vol. 32, no 5, p. e444-e450
Keywords [en]
badminton, injury, consensus, epidemiologic studies
National Category
Health Sciences
Identifiers
URN: urn:nbn:se:umu:diva-195029DOI: 10.1097/jsm.0000000000001048ISI: 000851600000002PubMedID: 35588081Scopus ID: 2-s2.0-85137113380OAI: oai:DiVA.org:umu-195029DiVA, id: diva2:1659674
Available from: 2022-05-20 Created: 2022-05-20 Last updated: 2022-11-24Bibliographically approved

Open Access in DiVA

No full text in DiVA

Other links

Publisher's full textPubMedScopus

Authority records

Martin, Fahlström

Search in DiVA

By author/editor
Martin, Fahlström
By organisation
Professional Development
In the same journal
Clinical Journal of Sports Medicine
Health Sciences

Search outside of DiVA

GoogleGoogle Scholar

doi
pubmed
urn-nbn

Altmetric score

doi
pubmed
urn-nbn
Total: 214 hits
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf