Umeå universitets logga

umu.sePublikationer
Driftstörningar
Det förekommer återkommande driftstörningar på några av sök-portalerna på grund av hög belastning. Vi arbetar på att lösa problemet, ni kan tillfälligt mötas av ett felmeddelande.
Ändra sökning
RefereraExporteraLänk till posten
Permanent länk

Direktlänk
Referera
Referensformat
  • apa
  • ieee
  • vancouver
  • Annat format
Fler format
Språk
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Annat språk
Fler språk
Utmatningsformat
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf
European society for vascular surgery clinical practice guideline development scheme: an overview of evidence quality assessment methods, evidence to decision frameworks, and reporting standards in guideline development
Department of Vascular and Endovascular Surgery, Manchester University NHS Foundation Trust, Manchester, UK; Division of Cardiovascular Sciences, School of Medical Sciences, Manchester Academic Health Science Centre, The University of Manchester, Manchester, UK .
Centro Hospitalar Universitário de Lisboa Central, Lisbon, Portugal; NOVA Medical School, Universidade NOVA de Lisboa, Portuga.
Department of Surgical Sciences, Section of Vascular Surgery, Uppsala University, Uppsala, Sweden.
Groupe Européen de Recherche sur les Prothèses Appliquées à la Chirurgie Vasculaire, Strasbourg, France; Department of Vascular Surgery and Kidney Transplantation, University Hospital of Strasbourg, France.
Visa övriga samt affilieringar
2022 (Engelska)Ingår i: European Journal of Vascular and Endovascular Surgery, ISSN 1078-5884, E-ISSN 1532-2165, Vol. 63, nr 6, s. 791-799Artikel, forskningsöversikt (Refereegranskat) Published
Abstract [en]

Objective: A structured and transparent approach is instrumental in translating research evidence to health recommendations and evidence informed clinical decisions. The aim was to conduct an overview and analysis of principles and methodologies for health guideline development.

Methods: A literature review on methodologies, strategies, and fundamental steps in the process of guideline development was performed. The clinical practice guideline development process and methodology adopted by the European Society for Vascular Surgery are also presented.

Results: Sophisticated methodologies for health guideline development are being applied increasingly by national and international organisations. Their overarching principle is a systematic, structured, transparent, and iterative process that is aimed at making well informed healthcare choices. Critical steps in guideline development include the assessment of the certainty of the body of evidence; evidence to decision frameworks; and guideline reporting. The goal of strength of evidence assessments is to provide well reasoned judgements about the guideline developers’ confidence in study findings, and several evidence hierarchy schemes and evidence rating systems have been described for this purpose. Evidence to decision frameworks help guideline developers and users conceptualise and interpret the construct of the quality of the body of evidence. The most widely used evidence to decision frameworks are those developed by the GRADE Working Group and the WHO-INTEGRATE, and are structured into three distinct components: background; assessment; and conclusions. Health guideline reporting tools are employed to ensure methodological rigour and transparency in guideline development. Such reporting instruments include the AGREE II and RIGHT, with the former being used for guideline development and appraisal, as well as reporting.

Conclusion: This guide will help guideline developers/expert panels enhance their methodology, and patients/clinicians/policymakers interpret guideline recommendations and put them in context. This document may be a useful methodological summary for health guideline development by other societies and organisations.

Ort, förlag, år, upplaga, sidor
Elsevier, 2022. Vol. 63, nr 6, s. 791-799
Nyckelord [en]
AGREE, Certainty of evidence, Clinical practice guidelines, Evidence to decision framework, GRADE, Quality of evidence
Nationell ämneskategori
Kirurgi
Forskningsämne
kirurgi
Identifikatorer
URN: urn:nbn:se:umu:diva-196829DOI: 10.1016/j.ejvs.2022.03.014ISI: 000839530600003PubMedID: 35697645Scopus ID: 2-s2.0-85131818618OAI: oai:DiVA.org:umu-196829DiVA, id: diva2:1672845
Tillgänglig från: 2022-06-20 Skapad: 2022-06-20 Senast uppdaterad: 2023-06-08Bibliografiskt granskad

Open Access i DiVA

Fulltext saknas i DiVA

Övriga länkar

Förlagets fulltextPubMedScopus

Person

Wanhainen, Anders

Sök vidare i DiVA

Av författaren/redaktören
Wanhainen, Anders
Av organisationen
Kirurgi
I samma tidskrift
European Journal of Vascular and Endovascular Surgery
Kirurgi

Sök vidare utanför DiVA

GoogleGoogle Scholar

doi
pubmed
urn-nbn

Altmetricpoäng

doi
pubmed
urn-nbn
Totalt: 376 träffar
RefereraExporteraLänk till posten
Permanent länk

Direktlänk
Referera
Referensformat
  • apa
  • ieee
  • vancouver
  • Annat format
Fler format
Språk
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Annat språk
Fler språk
Utmatningsformat
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf