Umeå University's logo

umu.sePublications
Operational message
There are currently operational disruptions. Troubleshooting is in progress.
Change search
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf
Can we rely on the activated clotting time to measure heparin anticoagulation?: a clinical evaluation of two ACT monitors
Umeå University, Faculty of Medicine, Department of Public Health and Clinical Medicine.
Umeå University, Faculty of Medicine, Department of Public Health and Clinical Medicine.ORCID iD: 0000-0002-8171-7227
Umeå University, Faculty of Medicine, Department of Public Health and Clinical Medicine.
2020 (English)In: The journal of extra-corporeal technology, ISSN 0022-1058, Vol. 52, no 3, p. 212-217Article in journal (Refereed) Published
Abstract [en]

The sensitivity to heparin during cardiopulmonary bypass (CPB) is determined by patient-specific characteristics and is assessed by the whole blood activated clotting time (ACT). We aimed to examine reliability measures between two different ACT monitors using Bland-Altman analysis: bias should not exceed 50 ± 50 seconds for measurements performed during CPB or 10 ± 10 seconds before and after CPB. The ACT response should be linear in relation to the concentration of heparin in plasma. Twenty patients (n = 20) aged 20-80 years and admitted for coronary artery bypass surgery were enrolled to this clinical observational study. ACT values and antifactor Xa were sampled: 1) before induction of anesthesia, 2) after heparin bolus, 3) during CPB at the start of rewarming, 4) at weaning from CPB, and 5) after heparin reversal. The evaluation comprised the Hemostasis Management System Plus™ (HMS, Medtronic Inc., Minneapolis, MN) and i-STAT™ (Abbott, Point of Care Inc., Princeton, NJ). Bias for the HMS Plus™ vs. i-STAT™ was +105 ± 119 seconds for measurements during CPB and +2.8 ± 11.7 seconds before and after CPB. Associated limits of agreement for the observed bias were ±235 and ±23 seconds, respectively. Inter-device correlation of ACT values was .46 (p < .001) during CPB; otherwise .48 (p = .02). Both devices produced ACT values unrelated (<10%) to the measured heparin concentration. The use of multivariable regression analysis demonstrated an independent association between the ACT measurement and hematocrit, however, not with the plasma concentration of heparin. ACT monitors demonstrate unacceptable bias differences, combined with wide limits of agreement. The ACT response correlated with hematocrit, but not with the actual heparin concentration.

Place, publisher, year, edition, pages
American Society of Extra-Corporeal Technology , 2020. Vol. 52, no 3, p. 212-217
Keywords [en]
activated clotting time, anticoagulation, cardiopulmonary bypass, heparin and heparin concentration, point of care
National Category
Cardiology and Cardiovascular Disease
Identifiers
URN: urn:nbn:se:umu:diva-197862DOI: 10.1051/ject/202052212PubMedID: 32981959Scopus ID: 2-s2.0-85091809692OAI: oai:DiVA.org:umu-197862DiVA, id: diva2:1681852
Available from: 2022-07-07 Created: 2022-07-07 Last updated: 2025-02-10Bibliographically approved

Open Access in DiVA

No full text in DiVA

Other links

Publisher's full textPubMedScopus

Authority records

Nilsson, SamuelAppelblad, MicaelSvenmarker, Staffan

Search in DiVA

By author/editor
Nilsson, SamuelAppelblad, MicaelSvenmarker, Staffan
By organisation
Department of Public Health and Clinical Medicine
Cardiology and Cardiovascular Disease

Search outside of DiVA

GoogleGoogle Scholar

doi
pubmed
urn-nbn

Altmetric score

doi
pubmed
urn-nbn
Total: 110 hits
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf