Umeå University's logo

umu.sePublications
Change search
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf
Rapid screening for neglect following stroke: A systematic search and European Academy of Neurology recommendations
Department Experimental Psychology, University of Oxford, Oxford, United Kingdom; Queensland Brain Institute, University of Brisbane, Qld, Brisbane, Australia.
Department Experimental Psychology, University of Oxford, Oxford, United Kingdom.
Department of Neurology, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria.
Geoffrey Jefferson Brain Research Centre, Manchester Academic Health Science Centre, Northern Care Alliance and University of Manchester, Manchester, United Kingdom.
Show others and affiliations
2022 (English)In: European Journal of Neurology, ISSN 1351-5101, E-ISSN 1468-1331, Vol. 29, no 9, p. 2596-2606Article, review/survey (Refereed) Published
Abstract [en]

Background and purpose: Unilateral neglect is a common cognitive disorder following stroke. Neglect has a significant impact on functional outcomes, so it is important to detect. However, there is no consensus on which are the best screening tests to administer to detect neglect in time-limited clinical environments.

Methods: Members of the European Academy of Neurology Scientific Panel on Higher Cortical Functions, neuropsychologists, occupational therapists, and researchers produced recommendations for primary and secondary tests for bedside neglect testing based on a rigorous literature review, data extraction, online consensus meeting, and subsequent iterations.

Results: A total of 512 articles were screened, and 42 were included. These reported data from 3367 stroke survivors assessed using 62 neglect screens. Tests were grouped into cancellation, line bisection, copying, reading/writing, and behavioral. Cancellation tasks were most frequently used (97.6% of studies), followed by bisection, copying, behavioral, and reading/writing assessments. The panel recommended a cancellation test as the primary screening test if there is time to administer only one test. One of several cancellation tests might be used, depending on availability. If time permits, one or more of line bisection, figure copying, and baking tray task were recommended as secondary tests. Finally, if a functional and ecological test is feasible, the Catherine Bergego Scale was recommended. Overall, the literature suggests that no single test on its own is sufficient to exclude a diagnosis of neglect. Therefore, the panel recommended that multiple neglect tests should be used whenever possible.

Conclusions: This study provides consensus recommendations for rapid bedside detection of neglect in real-world, clinical environments.

Place, publisher, year, edition, pages
John Wiley & Sons, 2022. Vol. 29, no 9, p. 2596-2606
Keywords [en]
cognitive impairments, diagnostic screening programs, hemispatial neglect, stroke
National Category
Neurology
Identifiers
URN: urn:nbn:se:umu:diva-197909DOI: 10.1111/ene.15381ISI: 000818887600001PubMedID: 35510782Scopus ID: 2-s2.0-85133038949OAI: oai:DiVA.org:umu-197909DiVA, id: diva2:1682049
Funder
Wellcome trustAvailable from: 2022-07-08 Created: 2022-07-08 Last updated: 2022-12-01Bibliographically approved

Open Access in DiVA

fulltext(1104 kB)234 downloads
File information
File name FULLTEXT02.pdfFile size 1104 kBChecksum SHA-512
18b65524a454573f308bda2bfdf42d1488d34999266474ac99b71c0503519c72be753a11712ff0f08d6fa87c33537227abf0540178f0994f5d1031e4e5edb91f
Type fulltextMimetype application/pdf

Other links

Publisher's full textPubMedScopus

Authority records

Fordell, Helena

Search in DiVA

By author/editor
Fordell, Helena
By organisation
Neurosciences
In the same journal
European Journal of Neurology
Neurology

Search outside of DiVA

GoogleGoogle Scholar
Total: 466 downloads
The number of downloads is the sum of all downloads of full texts. It may include eg previous versions that are now no longer available

doi
pubmed
urn-nbn

Altmetric score

doi
pubmed
urn-nbn
Total: 221 hits
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf