Umeå University's logo

umu.sePublications
System disruptions
We are currently experiencing disruptions on the search portals due to high traffic. We are working to resolve the issue, you may temporarily encounter an error message.
Change search
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • apa-6th-edition.csl
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf
The Ascendency of Process over Outcome: considering the challenges of how to present the object of research through design
Edinburgh Napier University, Edinburgh, Scotland.
Edinburgh Napier University, Edinburgh, Scotland.
University of Sussex, Brighton, UK.
University of Southern Denmark, Kolding, Denmark.ORCID iD: 0000-0002-0151-3110
2018 (English)In: DRIS2018: Conversations, 2018, article id CN16Conference paper, Oral presentation with published abstract (Refereed)
Abstract [en]

Research through Design is a process that has been absorbed into the mainstream but without consideration of what it fully entails. In this Conversation, we go back to the original sense of the term and look at how each of us might interpret and apply it in our work so that the notion of process is foregrounded. For some, this means taking the learning from processes that have not developed as expected. For others, it is about how societal or personal process itself may be designed. How can process itself be captured and presented?How can research whose primary material is inherently immaterial be adequatelypresented? The challenge is to find ways of presenting a dynamic narrative of research process, which remains accessible after the fact. The snap-shots and freeze-frames of still/video photography and artefacts produced and recorded during the research processare a trail of evidence left behind after the crime. How do we catch the research redhanded? In what ways can the dynamic immaterial research narrative be presented as itsown 'artefact' rather than having to rely on second-hand documentation?

Place, publisher, year, edition, pages
2018. article id CN16
National Category
Design
Identifiers
URN: urn:nbn:se:umu:diva-198092OAI: oai:DiVA.org:umu-198092DiVA, id: diva2:1684988
Conference
DRS2018, Design Research Society Biennial Conference, Limerick, Ireland, June 25-28, 2018
Available from: 2022-07-30 Created: 2022-07-30 Last updated: 2025-02-24Bibliographically approved

Open Access in DiVA

No full text in DiVA

Other links

Full text

Authority records

Wilde, Danielle

Search in DiVA

By author/editor
Wilde, Danielle
Design

Search outside of DiVA

GoogleGoogle Scholar

urn-nbn

Altmetric score

urn-nbn
Total: 153 hits
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • apa-6th-edition.csl
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf