Umeå University's logo

umu.sePublications
Change search
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf
Adaptive capacity in the multi-level management system of migratory waterbirds: a case study of participatory goose management in Sweden
Umeå University, Faculty of Social Sciences, Department of Geography.ORCID iD: 0000-0002-6673-0079
Environmental Psychology, Department of Architecture and Built Environment, Lund University, Lund, Sweden.
Grimsö Wildlife Research Station, Department of Ecology, Swedish University of Agricultural Sciences (SLU), Riddarhyttan, Sweden.
Umeå University, Faculty of Social Sciences, Department of Political Science.ORCID iD: 0000-0002-7674-6197
Show others and affiliations
2024 (English)In: Journal of Environmental Planning and Management, ISSN 0964-0568, E-ISSN 1360-0559, Vol. 67, no 3, p. 522-541Article in journal (Refereed) Published
Abstract [en]

Adaptive management (AM) is one approach to manage migratory waterbirds, but obstacles to the implementation of AM require adaptive capacities in the management system (rules, institutions, action situations). This study aims to examine the adaptive capacity of participatory goose management in Sweden. Considering the biophysical and institutional context, we analyzed how tangible, individual, and governance assets were associated with technical and social learning. Interviews with informants in the national council for geese, swans, and cranes, and local management groups (LMGs) were conducted, and documentation reviewed. Results revealed evidence of a local preparedness in areas with an LMG. Nevertheless, the study highlighted a need to formalize the evolving system, to consider a more systematic implementation of AM (including regulations allowing for adaptive responses), and to ensure stakeholder acceptance for management tools and visions. The study illustrates the need for a broad set of assets to ensure learning in participatory management.

Place, publisher, year, edition, pages
Routledge, 2024. Vol. 67, no 3, p. 522-541
Keywords [en]
multi-level management, technical learning, social learning, geese, wildlife
National Category
Ecology Human Geography
Research subject
Psychology
Identifiers
URN: urn:nbn:se:umu:diva-200415DOI: 10.1080/09640568.2022.2124153ISI: 000869143300001Scopus ID: 2-s2.0-85140000257OAI: oai:DiVA.org:umu-200415DiVA, id: diva2:1704597
Available from: 2022-10-18 Created: 2022-10-18 Last updated: 2024-04-26Bibliographically approved

Open Access in DiVA

fulltext(1267 kB)62 downloads
File information
File name FULLTEXT02.pdfFile size 1267 kBChecksum SHA-512
abd5c180e6b750ef25cb2e7a2deeaabfafc6c93ae726938e93a91b13aedc873c9cb179fe824577f8db168821f276c2573d3427f570f67bbbb50e8e302a16fb4f
Type fulltextMimetype application/pdf

Other links

Publisher's full textScopus

Authority records

Eriksson, LouiseSandström, Camilla

Search in DiVA

By author/editor
Eriksson, LouiseSandström, Camilla
By organisation
Department of GeographyDepartment of Political Science
In the same journal
Journal of Environmental Planning and Management
EcologyHuman Geography

Search outside of DiVA

GoogleGoogle Scholar
Total: 174 downloads
The number of downloads is the sum of all downloads of full texts. It may include eg previous versions that are now no longer available

doi
urn-nbn

Altmetric score

doi
urn-nbn
Total: 431 hits
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf