Umeå University's logo

umu.sePublications
Change search
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf
International survey on opinions and use of minimally invasive surgery in small bowel neuroendocrine neoplasms
Show others and affiliations
2022 (English)In: European Journal of Surgical Oncology, ISSN 0748-7983, E-ISSN 1532-2157, Vol. 48, no 6, p. 1251-1257Article in journal (Refereed) Published
Abstract [en]

INTRODUCTION: Although minimally invasive surgery is becoming the standard technique in gastrointestinal surgery, implementation for small bowel neuroendocrine neoplasms (SB-NEN) is lagging behind. The aim of this international survey was to gain insights into attitudes towards minimally invasive surgery for resection of SB-NEN and current practices.

METHODS: An anonymous survey was sent to surgeons between February and May 2021 via (neuro)endocrine and colorectal societies worldwide. The survey consisted of questions regarding experience of the surgeon with minimally invasive SB-NEN resection and training.

RESULTS: A total of 58 responses from five societies across 20 countries were included. Forty-one (71%) respondents worked at academic centers. Thirty-seven (64%) practiced colorectal surgery, 24 (41%) endocrine surgery and 45 (78%) had experience in advanced minimally invasive surgery. An open, laparoscopic or robotic approach was preferred by 23 (42%), 24 (44%), and 8 (15%) respondents, respectively. Reasons to opt for a minimally invasive approach were mainly related to peri-operative benefits, while an open approach was preferred for optimal mesenteric lymphadenectomy and tactile feedback. Additional training in minimally invasive SB-NEN resection was welcomed by 29 (52%) respondents. Forty-three (74%) respondents were interested in collaborating in future studies, with a cumulative median (IQR) annual case load of 172 (86-258).

CONCLUSIONS: Among respondents, 69% applies minimally invasive surgery for resection of SB-NEN. Arguments for specific operative approaches differ, and insufficient training in advanced laparoscopic techniques seems to be a barrier. Future collaborative studies can provide better insight in selection criteria and optimal technique.

Place, publisher, year, edition, pages
Elsevier, 2022. Vol. 48, no 6, p. 1251-1257
Keywords [en]
Minimally invasive surgery, Neuroendocrine neoplasms, Survey
National Category
Surgery
Identifiers
URN: urn:nbn:se:umu:diva-202714DOI: 10.1016/j.ejso.2021.11.011ISI: 000880291300009PubMedID: 34823919Scopus ID: 2-s2.0-85119661143OAI: oai:DiVA.org:umu-202714DiVA, id: diva2:1726456
Available from: 2023-01-13 Created: 2023-01-13 Last updated: 2023-01-16Bibliographically approved

Open Access in DiVA

fulltext(371 kB)104 downloads
File information
File name FULLTEXT01.pdfFile size 371 kBChecksum SHA-512
3999516f2119e262697a9681fec768381fca58bf0922e9f832a2f581a2091435cc296536502ed6c81ef43a3309ea30dca2525fd6a4d1652419748ea4f17379ba
Type fulltextMimetype application/pdf

Other links

Publisher's full textPubMedScopus

Authority records

Hennings, Joakim

Search in DiVA

By author/editor
Hennings, Joakim
By organisation
Surgery
In the same journal
European Journal of Surgical Oncology
Surgery

Search outside of DiVA

GoogleGoogle Scholar
Total: 105 downloads
The number of downloads is the sum of all downloads of full texts. It may include eg previous versions that are now no longer available

doi
pubmed
urn-nbn

Altmetric score

doi
pubmed
urn-nbn
Total: 197 hits
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf