Umeå University's logo

umu.sePublications
System disruptions
There are recurring service disruptions on some of the search portals due to high traffic. We are working to resolve the issue, you may temporarily encounter an error message.
Change search
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf
Validity of the short musculoskeletal function assessment questionnaire in patients with a spine fracture
Department of Clinical Science Intervention and Technology, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden; Department of Reconstructive Orthopaedics, Karolinska University Hospital, Huddinge, Sweden.
Umeå University, Faculty of Medicine, Department of Surgical and Perioperative Sciences, Orthopaedics.ORCID iD: 0000-0002-5469-2730
Department of Surgical Sciences, Uppsala University Hospital, Uppsala, Sweden.
Department of Orthopaedics, Institute of Clinical Sciences at Sahlgrenska Academy, University of Gothenburg, and Sahlgrenska University Hospital, Gothenburg, Sweden.
Show others and affiliations
2023 (English)In: European spine journal, ISSN 0940-6719, E-ISSN 1432-0932, Vol. 32, p. 1471-1479Article in journal (Refereed) Published
Abstract [en]

PURPOSE: The aim of this study was to validate the use of the Short Musculoskeletal Function Assessment (SMFA) questionnaire in patients with a spine fracture.

METHODS: Cross-sectional cohort of individuals that had sustained a spine fracture (C1-L5) one year earlier. Patients were asked to fill out SMFA, Oswestry Disability Index (ODI), EQ-5D-3L and EQ-VAS. Spearman's rank correlation coefficient (rho) was used to assess convergent validity for each patient-reported outcome measure (PROM). Bland-Altman plots were used to assess PROM agreement.

RESULTS: 82 patients completed all questionnaires. The correlations between SMFA Dysfunction and Bother indices and ODI were 0.89 and 0.86, with EQ-5D-3L index 0.89 and 0.80, and with EQ-VAS 0.80 and 0.73, respectively. The correlation for separate categories of the SMFA dysfunction index (daily activities, emotional status, arm and hand function, mobility) ranged between 0.71-0.87 for ODI, 0.72-0.84 for EQ-5D-3L index, and 0.67-0.77 for EQ-VAS. A selection of the ten items of SMFA that had the highest correlations with ODI resulted in a correlation of 0.91. The agreements between SMFA indices and ODI in Bland-Altman plots were good with small differential biases and minimal proportional biases, but worse for SMFA and EQ-5D-3L index and EQ-VAS.

CONCLUSION: The SMFA indices are highly correlated with ODI in patients with a spine fracture. The Dysfunction index and Bother index, or selected SMFA items, may be used to assess outcome in patients with spine fractures as an alternative to ODI.

Place, publisher, year, edition, pages
Springer, 2023. Vol. 32, p. 1471-1479
Keywords [en]
Musculoskeletal function assessment, Oswestry disability index, Patient-reported outcome measures, Short musculoskeletal function assessment, Spine fracture, Vertebral fracture
National Category
Orthopaedics
Identifiers
URN: urn:nbn:se:umu:diva-205175DOI: 10.1007/s00586-023-07581-zISI: 000939349900003PubMedID: 36829065Scopus ID: 2-s2.0-85148635135OAI: oai:DiVA.org:umu-205175DiVA, id: diva2:1739540
Funder
Karolinska InstituteSwedish Research Council, 2020-00493Uppsala UniversityRegion StockholmAvailable from: 2023-02-27 Created: 2023-02-27 Last updated: 2023-07-14Bibliographically approved

Open Access in DiVA

fulltext(822 kB)141 downloads
File information
File name FULLTEXT02.pdfFile size 822 kBChecksum SHA-512
3994de288252b371c2c645dbade96428e4a05374ca7c96a895a771701db8ae6bd64485f156bfa36924280a33cc1a0751e713fa706412268accaf4b6137708bc5
Type fulltextMimetype application/pdf

Other links

Publisher's full textPubMedScopus

Authority records

Mukka, Sebastian

Search in DiVA

By author/editor
Mukka, Sebastian
By organisation
Orthopaedics
In the same journal
European spine journal
Orthopaedics

Search outside of DiVA

GoogleGoogle Scholar
Total: 192 downloads
The number of downloads is the sum of all downloads of full texts. It may include eg previous versions that are now no longer available

doi
pubmed
urn-nbn

Altmetric score

doi
pubmed
urn-nbn
Total: 421 hits
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf