Umeå University's logo

umu.sePublications
Change search
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf
Dietary intake of total, heme and non-heme iron and the risk of colorectal cancer in a European prospective cohort study
Nutrition and Metabolism Branch, International Agency for Research on Cancer, Lyon, France; Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, School of Public Health, Imperial College London, London, United Kingdom.
Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, School of Public Health, Imperial College London, London, United Kingdom.
Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, School of Public Health, Imperial College London, London, United Kingdom.
Department of Epidemiology, University of Texas M. D. Anderson Cancer Center, TX, Houston, United States; Department of Epidemiology, Rollins School of Public Health, Emory University, GA, Atlanta, United States.
Show others and affiliations
2023 (English)In: British Journal of Cancer, ISSN 0007-0920, E-ISSN 1532-1827, Vol. 128, p. 1529-1540Article in journal (Refereed) Published
Abstract [en]

Background: Iron is an essential micronutrient with differing intake patterns and metabolism between men and women. Epidemiologic evidence on the association of dietary iron and its heme and non-heme components with colorectal cancer (CRC) development is inconclusive.

Methods: We examined baseline dietary questionnaire-assessed intakes of total, heme, and non-heme iron and CRC risk in the EPIC cohort. Sex-specific multivariable-adjusted hazard ratios (HRs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were computed using Cox regression. We modelled substitution of a 1 mg/day of heme iron intake with non-heme iron using the leave one-out method.

Results: Of 450,105 participants (318,680 women) followed for 14.2 ± 4.0 years, 6162 (3511 women) developed CRC. In men, total iron intake was not associated with CRC risk (highest vs. lowest quintile, HRQ5vs.Q1:0.88; 95%CI:0.73, 1.06). An inverse association was observed for non-heme iron (HRQ5vs.Q1:0.80, 95%CI:0.67, 0.96) whereas heme iron showed a non-significant association (HRQ5vs.Q1:1.10; 95%CI:0.96, 1.27). In women, CRC risk was not associated with intakes of total (HRQ5vs.Q1:1.11, 95%CI:0.94, 1.31), heme (HRQ5vs.Q1:0.95; 95%CI:0.84, 1.07) or non-heme iron (HRQ5vs.Q1:1.03, 95%CI:0.88, 1.20). Substitution of heme with non-heme iron demonstrated lower CRC risk in men (HR:0.94; 95%CI: 0.89, 0.99).

Conclusions: Our findings suggest potential sex-specific CRC risk associations for higher iron consumption that may differ by dietary sources.

Place, publisher, year, edition, pages
Springer Nature, 2023. Vol. 128, p. 1529-1540
National Category
Cancer and Oncology
Identifiers
URN: urn:nbn:se:umu:diva-204992DOI: 10.1038/s41416-023-02164-7ISI: 000962948100002PubMedID: 36759722Scopus ID: 2-s2.0-85147694973OAI: oai:DiVA.org:umu-204992DiVA, id: diva2:1741242
Available from: 2023-03-03 Created: 2023-03-03 Last updated: 2023-07-12Bibliographically approved

Open Access in DiVA

No full text in DiVA

Other links

Publisher's full textPubMedScopus

Authority records

van Guelpen, Bethany

Search in DiVA

By author/editor
van Guelpen, Bethany
By organisation
Department of Radiation SciencesWallenberg Centre for Molecular Medicine at Umeå University (WCMM)
In the same journal
British Journal of Cancer
Cancer and Oncology

Search outside of DiVA

GoogleGoogle Scholar

doi
pubmed
urn-nbn

Altmetric score

doi
pubmed
urn-nbn
Total: 342 hits
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf