Umeå University's logo

umu.sePublications
Change search
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf
Comparative characterisation and phytotoxicity assessment of biochar and hydrochar derived from municipal wastewater microalgae biomass
UK Biochar Research Centre, School of Geosciences, University of Edinburgh, Crew Building, Alexander Crum Brown Road, Edinburgh, United Kingdom.
Umeå University, Faculty of Science and Technology, Department of Chemistry. RISE Processum AB, Örnsköldsvik, Sweden.
Umeå University, Faculty of Science and Technology, Department of Chemistry.ORCID iD: 0000-0001-7589-9653
UK Biochar Research Centre, School of Geosciences, University of Edinburgh, Crew Building, Alexander Crum Brown Road, Edinburgh, United Kingdom.
2023 (English)In: Bioresource Technology, ISSN 0960-8524, E-ISSN 1873-2976, Vol. 386, article id 129567Article in journal (Refereed) Published
Abstract [en]

Microalgae, originating from a tertiary treatment of municipal wastewater, is considered a sustainable feedstock for producing biochar and hydrochar, offering great potential for agricultural use due to nutrient content and carbon storage ability. However, there are risks related to contamination and these need to be carefully assessed to ensure safe use of material from wastewater microalgae. Therefore, this study compared the properties and phototoxicity of biochar and hydrochar produced via pyrolysis and hydrothermal carbonisation (HTC) of microalgae under different temperatures and residence times. While biochar promoted germination and seedling growth by up to 11.0% and 70.0%, respectively, raw hydrochar showed strong phytotoxicity, due to the high content of volatile matter. Two post-treatments, dichloromethane (DCM) washing and further pyrolysis, proved to be effective methods for mitigating phytotoxicity of hydrochar. Additionally, biochar had 35.8–38.6% fixed carbon, resulting in higher carbon sequestration potential compared to hydrochar.

Place, publisher, year, edition, pages
Elsevier, 2023. Vol. 386, article id 129567
National Category
Environmental Sciences
Identifiers
URN: urn:nbn:se:umu:diva-212729DOI: 10.1016/j.biortech.2023.129567ISI: 001051266300001PubMedID: 37506941Scopus ID: 2-s2.0-85166234174OAI: oai:DiVA.org:umu-212729DiVA, id: diva2:1787805
Available from: 2023-08-15 Created: 2023-08-15 Last updated: 2025-04-24Bibliographically approved

Open Access in DiVA

fulltext(808 kB)189 downloads
File information
File name FULLTEXT01.pdfFile size 808 kBChecksum SHA-512
db3ba7ca861148e02b9a8a28d164e9569a51995598e723b7b6d7578256b8ed91e5ebebf0e715f516dca366e77d035bf9d44cceba3e4c3b093dc8e91f3056eb66
Type fulltextMimetype application/pdf

Other links

Publisher's full textPubMedScopus

Search in DiVA

By author/editor
Benavente, VeronicaJansson, Stina
By organisation
Department of Chemistry
In the same journal
Bioresource Technology
Environmental Sciences

Search outside of DiVA

GoogleGoogle Scholar
Total: 193 downloads
The number of downloads is the sum of all downloads of full texts. It may include eg previous versions that are now no longer available

doi
pubmed
urn-nbn

Altmetric score

doi
pubmed
urn-nbn
Total: 263 hits
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf