Umeå University's logo

umu.sePublications
Change search
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf
Denoising and uncertainty estimation in parameter mapping with approximate Bayesian deep image priors
Umeå University, Faculty of Medicine, Department of Radiation Sciences.ORCID iD: 0000-0002-0200-6567
Umeå University, Faculty of Medicine, Department of Radiation Sciences. Umeå University, Faculty of Science and Technology, Department of Computing Science.ORCID iD: 0000-0001-7119-7646
Umeå University, Faculty of Medicine, Department of Radiation Sciences.ORCID iD: 0000-0002-0532-232X
2023 (English)In: Magnetic Resonance in Medicine, ISSN 0740-3194, E-ISSN 1522-2594, Vol. 90, no 6, p. 2557-2571Article in journal (Refereed) Published
Abstract [en]

Purpose: To mitigate the problem of noisy parameter maps with high uncertainties by casting parameter mapping as a denoising task based on Deep Image Priors.

Methods: We extend the concept of denoising with Deep Image Prior (DIP) into parameter mapping by treating the output of an image-generating network as a parametrization of tissue parameter maps. The method implicitly denoises the parameter mapping process by filtering low-level image features with an untrained convolutional neural network (CNN). Our implementation includes uncertainty estimation from Bernoulli approximate variational inference, implemented with MC dropout, which provides model uncertainty in each voxel of the denoised parameter maps. The method is modular, so the specifics of different applications (e.g., T1 mapping) separate into application-specific signal equation blocks. We evaluate the method on variable flip angle T1 mapping, multi-echo T2 mapping, and apparent diffusion coefficient mapping.

Results: We found that deep image prior adapts successfully to several applications in parameter mapping. In all evaluations, the method produces noise-reduced parameter maps with decreased uncertainty compared to conventional methods. The downsides of the proposed method are the long computational time and the introduction of some bias from the denoising prior.

Conclusion: DIP successfully denoise the parameter mapping process and applies to several applications with limited hyperparameter tuning. Further, it is easy to implement since DIP methods do not use network training data. Although time-consuming, uncertainty information from MC dropout makes the method more robust and provides useful information when properly calibrated.

Place, publisher, year, edition, pages
John Wiley & Sons, 2023. Vol. 90, no 6, p. 2557-2571
Keywords [en]
deep image prior, denoising, parameter mapping, quantitative MRI, uncertainty estimation
National Category
Medical Imaging Computer graphics and computer vision
Identifiers
URN: urn:nbn:se:umu:diva-213711DOI: 10.1002/mrm.29823ISI: 001049833500001PubMedID: 37582257Scopus ID: 2-s2.0-85168117341OAI: oai:DiVA.org:umu-213711DiVA, id: diva2:1797466
Funder
Swedish Research Council, 2019‐0432Region Västerbotten, RV‐970119Cancerforskningsfonden i Norrland, AMP 18‐912Available from: 2023-09-14 Created: 2023-09-14 Last updated: 2025-09-09Bibliographically approved
In thesis
1. Noise reduction and uncertainty estimation in quantitative magnetic resonance imaging
Open this publication in new window or tab >>Noise reduction and uncertainty estimation in quantitative magnetic resonance imaging
2025 (English)Doctoral thesis, comprehensive summary (Other academic)
Alternative title[sv]
Brusreducering och osäkerhetsuppskattning i kvantitativ magnetresonanstomografi
Abstract [en]

Quantitative magnetic resonance imaging (qMRI) is a subset of MRI that moves beyond qualitative image interpretation towards more objective and reproducible quantification of tissue parameters, a process referred to as parameter mapping. In cancer imaging, this capability has the potential to assist with characterizing tumors, monitoring treatment response, and comparing scans both over time and across different scanners or imaging sites. This thesis addresses the problem of uncertainty in parameter mapping. This is done by developing methods that both reduce uncertainty and estimate the uncertainty that remains, two important components for advancing the clinical reliability of qMRI. The first component, reducing uncertainty, focuses on reducing noise in the parameter maps. In this thesis, we propose methods that apply denoising priors to stabilize the parameter mapping process. The second component, estimating the remaining uncertainty, aims to quantify what uncertainty remains after denoising has been applied. This is achieved through uncertainty estimation, providing a more complete picture of the results.

Paper I presents a method for T1 mapping that combines an explicit denoising prior, in the form of total variation (TV) regularization, together with uncertainty estimation using Markov chain Monte Carlo (MCMC) sampling. The strength of the TV prior is selected in a data-driven way which reduces the requirement of manual tuning. This approach produces denoised parameter maps with reduced uncertainty and meaningful uncertainty estimates. Remaining challenges include the computational burden and the need to carefully manage prior-induced biases.

Paper II introduces an alternative to the method in Paper I. Instead of using an explicit prior, it exploits Deep Image Prior (DIP), which utilizes the structure of an untrained convolutional neural network to impose an implicit prior. This is implemented with Monte Carlo dropout, a simple approach to approximate Bayesian inference for uncertainty estimation. The method is easy to implement and denoises the tissue parameters T1, T2, and ADC. However, the results reveal that uncertainty calibration becomes more challenging, and the computation time remains too long for practical clinical use.

Paper III improves the DIP method from Paper II by addressing long computation times and difficulties in uncertainty calibration. To reduce computation times, we introduce warm-start initialization, which leverages information from both neighboring image slices and different subjects to accelerate parameter mapping. To improve calibration, we systematically tune MC dropout to reduce miscalibration. In addition, a data-driven early stopping criterion is proposed to automatically set the denoising level, removing the need for manual tuning. Together, these changes make the DIP method faster, better calibrated, and more clinically usable.

Paper IV investigates further improvements of the DIP method towards more advanced qMRI models, specifically evaluated with Patlak-based estimation of pharmacokinetic parameters in DCE-MRI. This study evaluates the feasibility of this approach by comparing parameter maps with and without the DIP method applied. Preliminary results show substantial noise reduction and improved feature representation. Remaining challenges include prior-induced biases that require further refinement.

In summary, this thesis addresses uncertainty in qMRI by focusing on two key components: reducing uncertainty through denoising and estimating the remaining uncertainty. These aspects are investigated using two fundamentally different strategies: one based on explicit denoising with robust Bayesian inference using MCMC (Paper I), and one based on implicit denoising combined with approximate Bayesian inference (Papers II-IV). The four included studies develop and refine these strategies to overcome practical limitations and enhance applicability. By evaluating their respective strengths and weaknesses, the work provides insight into how methodological choices affect accuracy, uncertainty, and computational feasibility. These contributions aim to support the development of qMRI as a more trustworthy and reproducible tool in cancer imaging and beyond.

Place, publisher, year, edition, pages
Umeå: Umeå University, 2025. p. 78
Series
Umeå University medical dissertations, ISSN 0346-6612 ; 2376
Keywords
Quantitative MRI, Denoising, Uncertainty estimation, Markov chain Monte Carlo, Deep Image Prior
National Category
Radiology and Medical Imaging
Research subject
radiation physics
Identifiers
urn:nbn:se:umu:diva-244020 (URN)978-91-8070-760-2 (ISBN)978-91-8070-759-6 (ISBN)
Public defence
2025-10-03, Triple Helix, Universitetsledningshuset (plan 3), Umeå, 09:00 (English)
Opponent
Supervisors
Available from: 2025-09-12 Created: 2025-09-09 Last updated: 2025-09-11Bibliographically approved

Open Access in DiVA

fulltext(7926 kB)177 downloads
File information
File name FULLTEXT02.pdfFile size 7926 kBChecksum SHA-512
6a664aa5b6aaa1420d6e185bc0dea47dd7ce8918e56549c3a182e4e34a86f23ec816dc428c1f4ee0d6a61804a7935f94f9b70c1f1c030c967f5641493d745ea7
Type fulltextMimetype application/pdf

Other links

Publisher's full textPubMedScopus

Authority records

Hellström, MaxLöfstedt, TommyGarpebring, Anders

Search in DiVA

By author/editor
Hellström, MaxLöfstedt, TommyGarpebring, Anders
By organisation
Department of Radiation SciencesDepartment of Computing Science
In the same journal
Magnetic Resonance in Medicine
Medical ImagingComputer graphics and computer vision

Search outside of DiVA

GoogleGoogle Scholar
Total: 214 downloads
The number of downloads is the sum of all downloads of full texts. It may include eg previous versions that are now no longer available

doi
pubmed
urn-nbn

Altmetric score

doi
pubmed
urn-nbn
Total: 607 hits
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf