Umeå University's logo

umu.sePublications
Change search
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf
Assessment of navigated pedicle screws from intraoperative imaging: a prospective study of accuracy and agreement
Umeå University, Faculty of Medicine, Department of Surgical and Perioperative Sciences. Spine Unit, Department of Orthopedics, Umeå University Hospital, Umeå, Sweden.ORCID iD: 0000-0002-5920-293X
Epistat AB, Statistical analysis, Uppsala Science Park, Uppsala, Sweden.
Spine Unit, Department of Orthopedics, Umeå University Hospital, Umeå, Sweden.
Section of Neuroradiology, Regional Hospital of Sundsvall, Sundsvall, Sweden.
Show others and affiliations
2023 (English)In: International Journal of Spine Surgery, E-ISSN 2211-4599, Vol. 17, no 5, p. 684-689Article in journal (Refereed) Published
Abstract [en]

Background: Intraoperative (IO) image guidance surgery using 3-dimensional fluoroscopic navigation methods, such as the O-arm system, has improved the accuracy of pedicle screw placement in instrumented spine surgery. IO and postoperative (PO) validation of the implant’s correct position from radiological images is a decisive step to ensure patient safety and avoidance of complications related to implant misplacement. In this prospective single-center study, the authors investigated the accuracy and agreement of assessment of pedicle screws from IO O-arm images in comparison to PO computed tomography images. This study aimed to determine whether a final evaluation of pedicle screws can safely be conducted from IO images that supersede the PO computed tomography control.

Methods: A prospective single-center study was carried out at the Spine Unit in the Department of Orthopedics at Umeå University Hospital between 2019 and 2021. All patients enrolled in the study underwent instrumented thoracolumbar spine surgery using navigation. Imaging data were obtained from IO and PO examinations. Four reviewers—2 attending senior spine surgeons, 1 final year resident in orthopedics, and 1 attending neuroradiologist—classified pedicle screws using the Gertzbein and Robbins classification system. Agreement and accuracy of the reviewers were studied to evaluate the assessment of pedicle screws from IO and PO images.

Results: A total of 70 patients (422 screws) were included in the study. There was high accuracy among surgeons both on IO and PO images (0.96–0.97, 95% CI [0.94–0.99] and 0.97, 95% CI [0.94–0.99], respectively), and the overall agreement between all raters was 92% to 98% (95% CI [0.90, 1.00]). The discrepancy in assessment between optimal (Group 1) and suboptimal (Group 2) screws between IO and PO images was as low as 1% to 1.7%, which indicates that very few suboptimal screws are missed in the assessment of IO images.

Conclusions: The assessment of navigated pedicle screws using IO images is safe and reliable and may replace the need for further assessment using PO imaging.

Place, publisher, year, edition, pages
International Society for the Advancement of Spine Surgery (ISASS) , 2023. Vol. 17, no 5, p. 684-689
National Category
Orthopaedics
Identifiers
URN: urn:nbn:se:umu:diva-216249DOI: 10.14444/8550ISI: 001104219800006PubMedID: 37879846Scopus ID: 2-s2.0-85176237434OAI: oai:DiVA.org:umu-216249DiVA, id: diva2:1810075
Available from: 2023-11-06 Created: 2023-11-06 Last updated: 2025-04-24Bibliographically approved

Open Access in DiVA

No full text in DiVA

Other links

Publisher's full textPubMedScopus

Authority records

Åkerstedt, JosefinBobinski, Lukas

Search in DiVA

By author/editor
Åkerstedt, JosefinBobinski, Lukas
By organisation
Department of Surgical and Perioperative Sciences
Orthopaedics

Search outside of DiVA

GoogleGoogle Scholar

doi
pubmed
urn-nbn

Altmetric score

doi
pubmed
urn-nbn
Total: 198 hits
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf