Umeå University's logo

umu.sePublications
Change search
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf
Shear Bond Strength of Composite to Dentine with Various Adhesive Systems
Umeå University, Faculty of Medicine, Department of Odontology.
Umeå University, Faculty of Medicine, Department of Odontology.
2023 (English)Independent thesis Advanced level (degree of Master (Two Years)), 20 credits / 30 HE creditsStudent thesis
Abstract [en]

ABSTRACT 

Background

Different dental adhesive systems are used in modern restorative dentistry. Older adhesive systems such as etch and rinse systems of generation 4 have been extensively tested and proven reliable, newer adhesive systems such as self-etch systems of generation 7 and 8 have been developed with the aim of improving bonding performance, durability and to be less technique sensitive.

 Aim

This study aimed to compare the shear bond strength of universal adhesive systems from generation 7 (Futurabond DC) and Generation 8 (Scotchbond Universal, Optibond Universal) with an etch-and-rinse system from generation 4 (Optibond FL).

Methods

Four groups consisting of six specimens were prepared. The dentine specimens were then treated with four adhesive systems 1. Optibond FL, 2. Optibond Universal, 3. Futurabond DC and 4. Scotchbond Universal. Composite pillars were placed on the specimens and a shear bond strength test was performed. The results were analyzed with SPSS using One-way Kruskal-Wallis test (p<0.05).

Results

The OptiBond FL adhesive system exhibited the highest bond strength values, while the lowest values were observed in the Futurabond DC group. The results indicated significant differences in bond strength when comparing OptiBond FL to Futurabond DC and Scotchbond Universal (p<0.05). However, no significant difference was found between OptiBond FL and OptiBond Universal (p>0.05).

Conclusions

The three component etch-and-rinse system showed the highest median value of the systems tested. OptiBond FL and OptiBond Universal showed similar bond strength values, with the latter requiring fewer steps in clinical practice. More studies are needed for long-term durability and reliability.

Place, publisher, year, edition, pages
2023. , p. 18
National Category
Dentistry
Identifiers
URN: urn:nbn:se:umu:diva-218368OAI: oai:DiVA.org:umu-218368DiVA, id: diva2:1821299
Educational program
Dentistry Programme
Supervisors
Examiners
Available from: 2023-12-20 Created: 2023-12-19 Last updated: 2023-12-20Bibliographically approved

Open Access in DiVA

fulltext(555 kB)847 downloads
File information
File name FULLTEXT01.pdfFile size 555 kBChecksum SHA-512
2f10c6ce5cd3e75064dac30753e2b4aa9c68fefe5ee6dd7168e9de5f7a3fbea6a798f6fe58a458cd368fd240e6f027eba567452a6bc2deebc42ca08030a30b0f
Type fulltextMimetype application/pdf

Search in DiVA

By author/editor
Norstedt, Simon
By organisation
Department of Odontology
Dentistry

Search outside of DiVA

GoogleGoogle Scholar
Total: 850 downloads
The number of downloads is the sum of all downloads of full texts. It may include eg previous versions that are now no longer available

urn-nbn

Altmetric score

urn-nbn
Total: 747 hits
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf