Umeå University's logo

Background: Incorporating co-creation process in the development of interventions may improve the outcome. However, there is a lack of synthesis of co-creation practices in the development of Non-Pharmacological Interventions (NPIs) for Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD).

Objective: This scoping review aimed to examine the co-creation practice used when developing NPIs for people with COPD.

Methods: The methodology proposed by Arksey and O’Malley for scoping reviews was followed, and it was reported according to the PRISMA-ScR framework. The search included PubMed, Scopus, CINAHL, and Web of Science. Studies reporting on the process and/or analysis of applying co-creation practice in developing NPIs for people with COPD were included.

Results: 13 articles complied with the inclusion criteria. The composition of co-creators was diverse and reported in most of the included studies. Facilitating factors described in the co-creation practices included administrative preparations, diversity of stakeholders, cultural considerations, employment of creative methods, creation of an appreciative environment, and digital assistance. Few creative methods were mentioned or explained in the studies. Challenges around the physical limitations of patients, the absence of key stakeholder opinions, a prolonged process, recruitment, and digital illiteracy of co-creators were listed. Most of the studies did not report implementation considerations as a discussion point in their co-creation workshops.

Conclusion: This review provides suggestions for evidence-based co-creation in COPD care which may improve the quality of care delivered by NPIs.