Umeå University's logo

umu.sePublications
Change search
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf
Bivalirudin versus heparin in st and non-st-segment elevation myocardial infarction: outcomes at two years
Dept of Cardiology, Sahlgrenska University, Gothenburg, Sweden.
Dept of Medical Sciences, Uppsala Clinical Research Center, Uppsala University, Uppsala, Sweden.
Dept of Cardiology, Sahlgrenska University, Gothenburg, Sweden.
Dept of Cardiology, Örebro University, Faculty of Health, Sweden.
Show others and affiliations
2024 (English)In: Cardiovascular Revascularization Medicine, ISSN 1553-8389, E-ISSN 1878-0938, Vol. 66, p. 43-50Article in journal (Refereed) Published
Abstract [en]

Background: The registry-based randomized VALIDATE-SWEDEHEART trial (NCT02311231) compared bivalirudin vs. heparin in patients undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) for myocardial infarction (MI). It showed no difference in the composite primary endpoint of death, MI, or major bleeding at 180 days. Here, we report outcomes at two years.

Methods: Analysis of primary and secondary endpoints at two years of follow-up was prespecified in the study protocol. We report the study results for the extended follow-up time here.

Results: In total, 6006 patients were enrolled, 3005 with ST-segment elevation MI (STEMI) and 3001 with Non-STEMI (NSTEMI), representing 70 % of all eligible patients with these diagnoses during the study. The primary endpoint occurred in 14.0 % (421 of 3004) in the bivalirudin group compared with 14.3 % (429 of 3002) in the heparin group (hazard ratio [HR] 0.97; 95 % confidence interval [CI], 0.85–1.11; P = 0.70) at one year and in 16.7 % (503 of 3004) compared with 17.1 % (514 of 3002), (HR 0.97; 95 % CI, 0.96–1.10; P = 0.66) at two years. The results were consistent in patients with STEMI and NSTEMI and across major subgroups.

Conclusions: Until the two-year follow-up, there were no differences in endpoints between patients with MI undergoing PCI and allocated to bivalirudin compared with those allocated to heparin.

Place, publisher, year, edition, pages
Elsevier, 2024. Vol. 66, p. 43-50
Keywords [en]
Bivalirudin, Myocardial infarction, PCI, Unfractionated heparin
National Category
Cardiology and Cardiovascular Disease
Identifiers
URN: urn:nbn:se:umu:diva-223485DOI: 10.1016/j.carrev.2024.03.025ISI: 001313865900001PubMedID: 38575449Scopus ID: 2-s2.0-85189659388OAI: oai:DiVA.org:umu-223485DiVA, id: diva2:1853251
Funder
Swedish Heart Lung FoundationSwedish Foundation for Strategic ResearchSwedish Research CouncilAstraZenecaAvailable from: 2024-04-22 Created: 2024-04-22 Last updated: 2025-02-10Bibliographically approved

Open Access in DiVA

No full text in DiVA

Other links

Publisher's full textPubMedScopus

Authority records

Andersson, Jonas

Search in DiVA

By author/editor
Andersson, Jonas
By organisation
Cardiology
In the same journal
Cardiovascular Revascularization Medicine
Cardiology and Cardiovascular Disease

Search outside of DiVA

GoogleGoogle Scholar

doi
pubmed
urn-nbn

Altmetric score

doi
pubmed
urn-nbn
Total: 101 hits
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf